Answer:
Multibranding strategy
Explanation:
Multibranding strategy can be defined as a type of strategy in which a company gives its product a different brand name. It involves a producer selling different brands under the same product segment.
In Multibranding strategy there is no space for other competitors in the market. This strategy also strengthens the influence of these various products in the market.
A Multibranding strategy can lead to a great loss if it is not properly handled by the management of the organisation.
Answer:
inflation rate = 17.5 percent per year ⇒ it will take 4 years to double
inflation rate = 35 percent per year ⇒ it will take 2 years to double
inflation rate = 3.5 percent per year ⇒ it will take 20 years to double
Explanation:
we can use the rule of 70 to determine the amount of time it would take the general price level to double.
the rule of 70 is a simple way we can use to estimate the number of years it will take an investment to double given a certain growth rate.
70 / 17.5 = 4 years
70 / 35 = 2 years
70 / 3.5 = 20 years
There is no data shown, so we can not figure the 1 year cash flow
--
Answer:
c. There is a direct relationship between a good’s price and the amount offered for sale by suppliers.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply concept, it shows a direct relationship between the price and the quantity supplied.
As the price is rising, the quantity supplied also increases and if the rice is declining, the quantity supplied is also decreases
Since the supply curve slopes upward in the right direction which reflects the direct relationship between the price and the quantity supplied.
Answer:
producer surplus
consumer surplus
neither
Explanation:
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Consumer surplus = willingness to pay – price of the good
The highest amount i was willing to buy the watch is $71 but the price was $65. this illustrates a consumer surplus
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least price the seller is willing to sell the product
Producer surplus = price – least price the seller is willing to accept
The least amount the textbook seller was willing to sell was $48 while the price the textbook was sold was $54. thus, a illustrates a producer surplus.
for statement c, a transaction did not take place, so, it is neither a producer or consumer surplus