Answer:
Shays' Rebellion was led by Daniel Shay and Job Shattuck to overthrow the government, which was still going along with the Articles of Confederation, it happened a bit later than the date you said though.
The Articles of Confederation gave the states more power over the government, which could be considered both a pro and con, as it made the government weaker. But don't blame them too hard, they had just broke free from King George III for the exact reason of overpowered government, or monarchy.
Under the Articles, Congress had the power to establish laws, declare wars, and had control of the postal service. However, they were unable to enforce laws, also able to make peace, etc.
Both businessmen and farmers alike were upset with the system the new government had, so there's that.
It's probably best that they changed the government's ways to give themselves more power because you can't really trust every state to make the right decision. With a stronger government, there are also stronger laws.
Explanation:
THE ANSWER IS RIGHT ABOVE
False. It was a riot but it was about taxes and nothing to do with African Americans or Indians
Leadership motivates the people to a higher level of performance through their strong human relations. It is an important function of management which helps to maximize efficiency and to achieve organizational goals, so managers must have traits of a leader.
The differences between these two are much more important than the similarities. In fact, it is often said that political parties and interest groups are in competition with one another for power.
There are some similarities between these two. The main one is that they both want to get the government to do certain things. The NRA and the Republican Party, for example, both want the government to do less in the way of regulating people’s right to bear arms.
However, this is where the similarity ends. The major difference between the two is that the political parties care about many issues while interest groups only care about one. Using our previous example, it might be in the Republican Party’s interest to downplay issues of gun rights. The party might be able to attract broader support if it did not seem so dogmatic on this issue. By contrast, the NRA cares only about gun rights. It does not particularly care if the Republican Party expands its base just as long as only pro-gun people are elected to Congress.
Political parties try to create and hold together broad coalitions. They want to be able to govern effectively over a range of issues. Interest groups do not care about broad coalitions. They only care about winning on their particular issue.
(Hope you like my answer!) •^•
