I'd go with B.
It'd make sense to want to stand out if the staff read a lot of essays per day. You don't want yours to be included with the uninteresting "same-old" pile.
Answer:
D.Switches between first person and third person limited
Explanation:
To answer this question correctly, we need to understand the differences between the perspectives. The first person point of view has the characteristic that it only allows the reader to experience the action and thoughts of a character within a book, which means that the first person is limited in itself. Also, it is grammatically characterized by the use of the pronoun I. The third person, on the other hand, gives a more integral perception of the story, a fuller view, and it is grammatically characterized by the use of any other pronouns except I. However, while the simple third person is limited also to only the emotions, actions, thoughts and feelings of one character, the third person omniscient detaches the reader from a single character and allows him/her to have full view of all the characters, all the actions taken by all the characters and knows information that even the characters themselves might not know. The best way to know when a writer is using any of these perspectives, is by focusing on the pronouns being used. In this case, we have two instances. The use of the third person, because we have someone narrating the characteristics of the house of Miss Lottie, in comparisson with those of all others. It is also evident when the writer uses "our" that this person is part of the characters, so this person is narrating and also participating and whatever is happening is depending on this character´s narration. Then, after all the details, the narrator passes to the first person by saying: "There it stood and as far as I know is standing yet". This is why the correct answer is D. Switches between first person and third person limited.
Answer:
C. neutrality
Explanation:
Wantonness - The state or characteristic of being wanton; recklessness, especially as represented in lascivious or other excessive behavior.
I that it is C because a synonym for lascivious is neutral
Answer:
The answer is C, Who's coming to your house for dinner?
Explanation:
If we look at all the answer choices in depth we can see why the clear answer is C.
A. Wrong usage of the word "two", two represents the number form and the proper usage would be "too".
B. Wrong usage of "you're". The word you're represents "you are", and putting it together it doesn't sound right and in general isn't the right usage.
C. No grammar issues, correct usage of Who's since it is an abbreviation for "who is".
D. Incorrect usage of Whose, I would assume it would be who's.
*Note: if the answer had two correct options I would choose C and D :)
