Answer:
Answer is 12.64%. Therefore,
Treasury bills are paying a 4% rate of return. A risk-averse investor with a risk aversion of A = 3 should invest entirely in a risky portfolio with a standard deviation of 24% only if the risky portfolio's expected return is at least 12.64%.
Refer below for the explanation.
Explanation:
E - 4%= 0.5(3)(24%)2
E=12.64%
The type of care that Bill is receiving is hospice care. It is a care of which they focus on patients or individual who are ill, either chronically or terminally. They tend to provide the care that the patients need in regards to their needs of both spiritually and even emotionally. It could be seen above as Bill is being cared for as he is ill and is being provided by the care he needs.
Answer:
$15 million
Explanation:
The three investors' total investments would add up to 100% or 1.
The first two invested in the ration of 2:3
It means ;
Investor 1: 2/5
Investor 2: 3/5
If investor 3 invested twice as investor 1 and 2, then we can deduce that he invested ( 2/5 + 3/5) x 2
the new denominator is 10, meaning
Investor 1 had 2/10,
investor 2 had 3/10
investor 3 had 5/10
If total investments were $30 million, then the highest investor invested
5/10 x $30million
=0.5 x $30 million
=$15 million
In my opinion, bad neighborhoods have a large amount of cell phone stores because the people in the bad neighborhood usually don't come across (or have for that matter) phones. And to see the 'cool' cellphones in person and to have the people sell it in person, the people in the bad neighborhood should want it more. And considering the modern generation we are living in right now, people like technology and want it, in the term 'humans as economical creatures', a human's want will never be satisfied, they will always want more. So, as I said, people and their families like technology, and all the cellphone sellers will come to the neighborhoods who will buy and want more, why would they sell in places where people already have cell phones, so they go to bad neighborhoods.
unless you mean 'bad' isn't 'not highly rich' then I don't know, but as a thirteen year old, I tried.
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
A life estate comprehends the property that someone owns during a lifetime. The benefit of a life estate is that property will transfer without the need of the beneficiary appearing in the will after the holder is deceased. They cannot put the property on sale until the holder's decease, though. As well, holders cannot do anything at will without consulting their simple-fee owners.
