Answer:
The correct answer is that officials in Congress today frequently vote along favoring the Democratic or Republican gathering's stand on an issue. On the other hand, in the country's initial history legislators would in general vote as delegates of their states, as opposed to as agents of an ideological group.
Voters may think about their own Representatives or Senators as great individuals battling the debasement and narrow minded voracity of the others. Occupant up-and-comers regularly support this speculation like by professing to have "spared" the region from fiasco through their acts of kindness. It causes them win races.
Both cases sought to promote diversity.
Hernandez v Texas was a 1954 Supreme Court decision that extended protection against discrimination to Hispanics. Grutter v Bollinger was an affirmative action case whereby the Court ruled that race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor;
It was a treaty between the United States and Spain in 1819 that ceded Florida to the U.S. and defined the boundary between the U.S. and New Spain.
Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States that by the accession of a Republican Administration their property and their peace and ... There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. ... that the property, peace, and security of no section are to be in any wise endangered by ...
Answer:
they both attempted to preserve the Union
