All categories

3 years ago

Evaluate (25−10)+(15÷3)

Mathematics

2 answers:

marishachu [46]3 years ago

6 0

Not a hundred % sure but I got 20

Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago

3 0

The final answer is 20.

Here are the steps I used.

1. Reduce 25 - 10 to 15 ( 15 + 15 divided by 3)

2. Simplify 15 divided by 3 to 5 ( 15 + 5)

3. Now from step 2 ( 15 + 5 = 20 so that is your final answer :) )

Hope this helps.

You might be interested in

What are the coordinate of ABC after a dilation with center 0,0 and a scale factor of 3 please help

mojhsa [17]

Answer:

Note that both the x and y coordinates are multiplied by the SAME value, k. Given ΔDEF with center of dilation the origin (0,0) and scale factor of 2, plot ΔD'E'F'. As shown in the formula above, multiply each x and y coordinate value by the scale factor of 2 to find the new coordinates

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write 7/20 as a percent.<br><br> By what factor should you multiply the denominator and numerator?

levacccp [35]

Answer:

35%

Step-by-step explanation:

Use photomath it tells you everything.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the coordinates of the center and the measure of the radius for a circle whose equation is (x - 3)^2 + (y - 7)^2 = 2.

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Equation for a circle of radius r, centered at (h,k):

(x-h)² + (y-k)² = r²

3 0

3 years ago

A sample of 200 observations from the first population indicated that x1 is 170. A sample of 150 observations from the second po

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

a) For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b) Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c) $z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d) Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{1}=170$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 1

$X_{2}=110$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 2

$n_{1}=200$ sample 1 selected

$n_{2}=150$ sample 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{170}{200}=0.85$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 1

$p_{2}=\frac{110}{150}=0.733$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 2

$\hat p$ represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

$\alpha=0.05$ significance level given

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference between the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

a.State the decision rule.

For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b. Compute the pooled proportion.

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c. Compute the value of the test statistic.

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d. What is your decision regarding the null hypothesis?

Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

5 0

3 years ago

Devon is 30 years older than his son, Milan. The sum of both their ages is 48. Using the variables d and m to represent the ages

statuscvo [17]

Answer+Step-by-step explanation:

m = man's age

s = son's age

m=s+36

(m+8)=3*(s+8)

Resolves to: s=10, m=46

So the man is 46 (=10+36).

In 8 years, son is 18 (=10+8), man is 54 (=3*18 and 46+8), thank you.

5 0

3 years ago