Answer: A unitary system is one in which power can be granted to or taken back from regions by a decision of central authority without the involvement of the regions themselves while a federal system is one in which there is division of power between a federal government and sub-federal governments(most times state and local governments)
Explanation: characteristics of unitary system include:
1. central government has sovereignty over what happens at every sub-level
2. sub level competencies are defined by statute and not enshrined in the written constitution
3. There is no direct participation of sub-levels in constitutional amendments
Characteristics of federal system include:
1. federal laws supercede state laws
2. federal laws must be applied by state courts
3.federal powers are limited and state powers are protected by the constitution
4. There's representation of states in parliament and states actively participate in constitutional amendments
Example of governments practising unitary system is the United Kingdom, Norway, Romania and Israel while federal system is practised in the United States, Canada, Germany and Australia.
The appropriate response is Joint Interagency Coordination Group (JIACG). It is an interagency staff gather that builds up to normal, convenient, and collective working connections amongst nonmilitary personnel and military operational organizers. A large portion of these destinations require the joined and facilitated utilization of the discretionary, enlightening, military, and monetary instruments of national power.
D)They traveled in harsh, crowded conditions
Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
