Answer:The Haitian Revolution has been defined by violence, where the American and French Revolutions were defined by liberty and freedom. This is ironic since they Haitian Revolutionaries arguably were also fighting for freedom, but from slavery as opposed to an oppressive government.
Explanation:
Answer:
The reason why the promise of "40 acres and a mule disappointed many newly freed African Americans.
Was because, after the death of former president Abraham Lincoln, President Andrew Johnson mandated to reverse ownership of land from African Americans, and offered only payment for the work of the land.
Explanation:
When former president Abraham Lincoln was alive he made the promise. However when he died and Andrew Johnson replaced him. He just backed it up and blocked African Americans from owning the land. Instead, he offered them payment. Also, most African Americans obtained land through a private transaction. They were disappointed because the government failed its promise.
Answer:
he was in control of the colonies, and his unfair treatment and tyranny caused the colonies to revolt and attempt to become their own country.
<u>Beliefs of both Federalists and anti-federalists:</u>
After the proposal of the new Constitution in the United States in 1787, the process of ratification became a prime subjects of argument as there arose two side to debate on it. Those who were in favour of the ratification and activation of new Constitution were termed as Federalists whereas those who were not thinking so, called the anti-federalists. Here are the prime beliefs of both the sides.
The Prime beliefs of both sides on the new Constitution's ratification
Belief of Federalists:
- The proposed Constitution was important for the survival and further development of the nation.
- A strong Government was necessary to excel after the previous failed Confederations.
Belief of Non-Federalists:
- The powers of the government, mentioned in the constitution was specifically granted and prohibited for doing more than that.
- The powers were separated into three groups rather than giving the complete authority an individual to control tyranny.
- The Constitution provided the system of checks and balances which wasn't required as all the branches were able to take care of their checks and balances.
- The Constitution provided addendum powers to the federal courts at the expense of the domestic courts which was unfair.
