The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
It is good to carry almonds with you because they are one of the best foods for regulating blood sugar My Parents make me eat it every morning its also good for the brain it helps you focus
Answer:
4. precise
<em>Hope</em><em> this</em><em> answer</em><em> correct</em><em> </em><em>:</em><em>)</em>
Interesting question,
P, R, and T have green cars. Q and S have black shoes. So in conclusion, nobody has both a green car and black shoes.
Because giving a speech allows plenty of thought and preparation and it also shows that you are very confident than giving a persuasive essay.
