Answer:
fandom culture is both good and bad
Explanation:
fandom culture had many pros and con that come along with it but so does most things in life.
Some pros to fandom culture are : They are like a tight group community of people who can make friends by the starter of that they both have a relatable topic - you . Another pro is that if you know anything will happen to you, you will have a group of people who look up to you to fall back on. With having a large fandom it can boost who sees you and you may be pushed further into the media. The final pro to fandom culture is that they feel safe and like you are their for them and they can also relate to you on a certain level.
Some cons to fandom culture are: You may be pushed so far into the spotlight that your life while just be followed to every minor detail. You also have the problem of the toxic fans theses are people who claim to be fans but are actually just there to cause chaos among the people who support you.
Also the problem of stalkers- people who will follow you until you reach the point of unsafety these people will do anything to practically make you life a living hell.Final con to all of this is the new and uprising cancel culture this is when people dig up past mistakes that you have made and use it against you now , if you do not have a apology up quicker than the speed of sound they will ruin you life.
I see no problem with fandom culture unless it gets to a point of toxicity were u are in harms way or mentally hurt (a member of the dsmp fandom)
I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
The detail from the "Address to the Niagara Movement" deals with the application of constitutional principles is "We claim for ourselves every single right that belongs to a freeborn American, political, civil and social; and until we get these rights we will never cease to protest and assail the ears of America."
<h3>What is "Address to the Niagara Movement"?</h3>
"Address to the Niagara Movement" is a speech about the rights of African American and the way they were treated in America.
The options are attached here:
- "We claim for ourselves every single right that belongs to a freeborn American, political, civil and social; and until we get these rights we will never cease to protest and assail the ears of America."
- "We want justice even for criminals and outlaws."
- "We refuse to surrender the leadership of this race to cowards and truckers."
- "We do not believe in violence, neither in the despised violence of the raid nor the lauded violence of the soldier, nor the barbarous violence of the mob, but we do believe in John Brown..."
Thus, the correct option is 1.
Learn more about "Address to the Niagara Movement"
brainly.com/question/25252243
#SPJ1
Answer:
there is no difference its all the same
Explanation:
can I get brainiest for being real
I would say it would be negative because when someone has an eerie smile, or look, they are usually scary, or very weird. Eerie means strange and frightening. So I would say it's negative.
