Answer and Explanation:
I've read somewhere that holding on to anger is like holding an ember with your hands to throw it at someone else. You end up burning yourself before you can even hurt the other person. I believe the quote in the question conveys essentially the same meaning. Holding anger serves no good purpose, nor does it bring any benefits.
I have been offended and mistreated several times during my life. Until not long ago, I had chosen to hold on to anger, constantly reminding myself of the offense and, consequently, living resentful. That has obviously - and very predictably - taken its toll on me. It became harder for me to keep my emotions under control. Every time I found myself facing a situation that resembled those previous ones, my brain and body would immediately react, as if an alarm had been activated inside me. I would get angry so fast, I didn't even see it coming. I would end up overreacting, being rude to the other person in a desperate measure to defend myself, my ego, my feelings. It turns out that was not a good tactic. Only recently I chose to learn and understand that forgiving and letting go of anger was the solution. It is not an easy task, and I haven't changed overnight. But I got myself together. Now, I take my time to breath, and then let go. Many of the problems and situations that would normally bother me have no effect on me whatsoever, leaving much room to happiness, calm, and relaxation.
Note: feel free to adapt this according to your own life experiences.
Answer:
e)
Explanation:
In psychology, Cognitive Dissonances refer to the distress that one person feels when he/she holds two or more contradictory ideas or when the person experiences evidences that contradict his/her own beliefs. What the person tries to do is to f<u>ind a way to reduce the contradiction</u> to reduce the dissonance (stress) this situation generates them.
When examining the options given, we can tell that<u> e) When experienced reality contradicts basic religious beliefs</u> is one of the definitions of generators of cognitive dissonances since reality (experience) contradicts religious (personal) own beliefs.
Note:
a) is not an example of cognitive dissonance because there's nothing in reality that contradicts the belief. The person can actually think that he's not good enough for God to answer his/her prayers.
b) Is not an example since the fact that different people worship different deities does not necessarily questions our own beliefs.
c) Religions evolve and accept new ideas. This could create cognitive Dissonance in some people (since technically, God's word is eternal) but it's not necessarily a cause of cognitive dissonance.
d) Religious drop certain practices. Similar as c)
Answer:
Hardiness
Explanation:
Hardiness -
It is the personality style , where the person is able to handle a lot of stress and tension and still live a very healthy and happy life , is referred to as hardiness.
It infuses three of the major psychological quantities , i.e. , challenge , control and commitment.
Hence , from the given information of the question, the correct term is hardiness.
I think it is on account of there is bigotry toward differences and on the grounds that there is dependably an area of the group that longings control and in light of the fact that there aren't sufficient assets to agreeably meet the essential needs of humankind, not to mention the needs. The variable likewise incorporates avarice. Not really cash but rather likewise the quest for region, assets, power and strength have and will keep on driving individuals to war.
