<u>Full question:</u>
You know that firm XYZ is very poorly run. On a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best), you would give it a score of 3. The market consensus evaluation is that the management score is only 2. Should you buy or sell the stock?
A. Buy
B. Sell
<u>Answer:</u>
Buy the stock
<u>Explanation:</u>
At any position in time, the stock price displays all candidly accessible erudition about the company. This implies that an investor can obtain abnormal returns only if that investor holds private erudition about the firm's forecasts.
The firm's administration is not as critical as everyone else considers it to be, hence, the firm is underestimated by the market. You are scarcely hopeless about the firm's probabilities than the assumptions constructed into the stock price. As the administration of the firm is not as weak as anticipated to be. So the investor will determine to buy the stocks of the firm.
The answer to the statement is yes. It is because laws are important to promote fairness and peace. Laws are established to get things done in order and in different places and environment, there are different laws to be followed in which the statement above is related to it.
Answer: Political Preference
Explanation: You cannot judge anyone based on their political views.
Answer: (C) The production of non durable consumer goods is more stable than the production of durable consumer goods over the business cycle.
Explanation:
The consumer durability of the goods has the significant life span and the production of the non durable goods of the consumer are basically purchased for the immediate consumption over the business cycle so that is why it is more stable as compared to the production of the durable goods.
The example of the durable consumer goods are smartphones, furniture and the other household appliances. On the other hand, the non durable consumer goods are more stable as it contain daily use material like food, clothes and beverages.