The answer I think it is ,is (B.)
Explanation:
a. The computation is shown below:
As we know that
Multiplier = 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
1.5 = 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
So, MPC is 0.3333
Now the real GDP is
= Multiplier × Government spending
= 0.3333 × $70 billion
= $105 million
So the change in real GDP is
= $105 million - $70 million
= $35 million
b. The computation is shown below:
As we know that
Multiplier = 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
Multiplier = 1 ÷ 1 - 0.6
So, multiplier is 2.5
Now the real GDP is
= Multiplier × Government spending
= 2.5 × $16 billion
= -$40 million
c. As we know that
Real GDP = Multiplier × Government spending
$280 billion = Multiplier × $70 billion
So, the multiplier is 4
Now the MPC is
Multiplier = 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
4 = 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
So, the multiplier is 0.75
Answer:
The manufacturer should announce a guaranteed mileage of 44528 miles
Explanation:
Problems of normally distributed samples are solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean 
and standard deviation 
, the zscore of a measure X is given by:
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
In this problem, we have that:
What guaranteed mileage should the manufacturer announce
Only until the 5th percentile will have to be replaced, which is the value of X when Z has a pvalue of 0.05. So it is X when Z = -1.645.
The manufacturer should announce a guaranteed mileage of 44528 miles
An inner tube for a swimming pool would be in high demand during the summer months, and in incredibly low demand in the winter months.
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
