1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
3 years ago
6

Unlike liberal critics of Roosevelt’s New Deal, conservative critics

History
2 answers:
natulia [17]3 years ago
8 0
<span>The answer to the question, is the third one. Not at all like liberal commentators of Roosevelt's New Deal, preservationist pundits thought New Deal programs extended government excessively. The New Deal was the arrangement of government projects propelled by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the wake of taking office in 1933, because of the disaster of the Great Depression, and enduring until American section into the Second World War in 1942.</span>
vovangra [49]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Unlike liberal critics of Roosevelt’s New Deal, conservative critics: thought New Deal programs expanded government too much. One negative impact of the new deal is that it make the citizen of united States became more dependent to the government. it may have solved short term problems during economic depression, but it will often lead to larger sinkhole into economic downfall in the future</span>
You might be interested in
Did America’s Industrialists (Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, Carnegie, etc.) deserve the nickname “Robber Baron”? Why or why not?
Reptile [31]

Answer: There was a time in U.S. history when the business magnates and titans of industry boasted more wealth than even today’s top technology innovators and visionaries.

During America’s Gilded Age — which spanned most of the latter half of the 19th century, from around 1870 to 1900 — the inflation-adjusted wealth and impact of America’s most towering figures far overshadowed what we see today.

The wealth of people like John D. Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Henry Ford, and Andrew Carnegie would by today’s standards be measured in the hundreds of billions of dollars — far more than tech giants like Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and even Jeff Bezos, the wealthiest individual in the world as of 2019.

Wealth so vast can often highlight the financial inequality of an era. It’s this idea of grandeur in the face of unresolved social concerns that led Mark Twain to coin the phrase “Gilded Age” in his 1873 novel The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today. The title suggested that the thin veneer of wealth for the elite masked broader issues for many in the lower and middle classes. But the progress made in the United States during the Gilded Age can’t be denied. As part of the Second Industrial Revolution, the country underwent an impressive economic expansion — led by the day’s larger-than-life figures of wealth and power. Much of this growth was courtesy of railroads — which now spanned from coast to coast — as well as factories, steel, and the coal mining industry.

Big business boomed, with technology such as typewriters, cash registers, and adding machines helping to transform how people worked. And the economic explosion included not only industrial growth, but also a growth in agricultural technology such as mechanical reapers.

In a time of such great expansion and fewer regulations surrounding wealth and business practices, circumstances were perfect for the rise of a class of extremely wealthy individuals who made up a very small percentage of society. They had the power and means to create opportunities and jobs for the many, though with less social prioritization on workers’ rights, issues like discrimination, exploitation, and low wages marked the era.

Still, it’s impossible to overstate the impact these individuals had on America’s development. With technology booming and immigrants flocking to the United States seeking better opportunities for themselves and their families, they left their mark on the United States — and on history.

Explanation: Read this and you'll find your answer~! I hope i helped you out~! And have an GREAT DAY~!! <\3

5 0
3 years ago
What happens when we run out of resources such as oil?
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

Cars might run on electricity, or even water. We might rely more heavily on public transportation, like trains and buses. Cities will look different, too. Without oil, cars may become a relic of the past.  :)

5 0
3 years ago
What did the Free Soil Party lobby for?
Strike441 [17]
Life is attainable at any aspects
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Each member of the House of Representatives represents 600,000 people.<br><br> True<br><br> False
Andrew [12]
The answer is either true or false i think it is true

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The mechanization of the spinning process in the late 1700s led to
artcher [175]
The answer is: A high demand for cotton. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain why president Lincoln wanted the south to attack federal troops
    10·1 answer
  • What role did the colonies play in mercantilism and the trans-atlantic trade ??
    11·1 answer
  • Which effect did not result from southern Plains tribes surrendering in 1875?
    8·2 answers
  • In recent years, what has changed about the process of supreme court appointments?
    15·1 answer
  • How are causes heard by the supreme court
    15·1 answer
  • What occurred following the Battle of Stalingrad
    12·1 answer
  • D Why did revolutions break out across Latin America during<br> the early 1800s?
    11·1 answer
  • During the Reign of Terror, trials and executions were carried out under the authority of… the National Assembly. the Committee
    14·1 answer
  • Hurry! Which one is it ?
    15·1 answer
  • Most people remember Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as reformers who practiced non-violent forms of protest and advocacy
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!