Answer:
$11 billion annually.
Explanation:
Firms carried out assessments based on their daily activities as well as employee assessment.
Employees in firms are assessed based on their productivity level, rate at which they are absent from work as well as their turnover rate in the firm.
Low productivity can be defined as a decrease in the production capacity of a firm due to the inefficiency of workers.
Absenteeism can be defined as when a person is not present at work. This may be due to genuine or deliberate reasons.
Employee turnover can be defined as the number of employees who leave a firm and are replaced with new employees.
Low productivity, consistent absenteeism and employee turnover rates are said to cause firms to lose a lot of money due to:
a. Payment of salary for absent workers
b. Having to find replacement for absent staffs.
c. Low productivity due to lack of or absent staffs.
It is estimated that firms lose $11 billion annually in productivity, absenteeism, and employee turnover due to caring for aging parents.
The answer is psychological contract.
A broken psychological contract may occur when an employee believes that working extra would be naturally rewarded. This, however, may not be business policy. If the person is salaried, they may not be compensated for the extra hours worked.
Daily acts and remarks made in the workplace, as well as how they are interpreted by all parties involved, have an impact on the contract.
`
In other words, it is a promise developed via regular workplace encounters in which the organization learns what is expected of each employee.
Psychological contracts evolve and adapt to the organizational working culture over time. However, they are generally difficult to change and can differ across individual party members and whole organizations.
To know more about employer and employee relationship click here:
brainly.com/question/13400621
#SPJ4
Answer:
Caveat emptor is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The audit expectation gap is caused by unrealistic user expectations. The auditors provides reasonable gap examples that would not be included in unrealistic user expectations.
NASBA believes the expectancy gap relating to fraud and going problems in a financial statement audit may be caused by a few factors: lack of knowledge by way of the general public as to what an audit is and what auditors do; inconsistent audit execution in these regions by some auditors due to lack of expertise.
The expectation hole exists while auditors and the public keep distinct beliefs about the auditors' obligations and obligations and the messages conveyed by way of audit reports. apparently, there's an opening between what the public expects and what it virtually receives.
Learn more about auditors here: brainly.com/question/26048609
#SPJ4
