Answer: 1.The first part was unnecessary and the second part had words that were redundant
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues.
Explanation:
1. The first part was unnecessary, since it was transitional phrases. The second part had words that were redundant. For example, you don't need the re in front of duplicate and with the word again. Or office in government with voting,
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues. The motto less is more pertains to this sentence.
Answer:
ok that sounds fun I will definitely do that
Answer:
Electrical engineering is the broader field
Explanation:
if i had a chance to change the past i would because iv made a lot of mistakes in my life and if i could fix them it would make the man i am now a lot better and i could make my family proud and i could start over and thats what a lot of people want and thats a second chance .
If you are telling us to revise the sentence, one error is that there is a double negative. 'not' and 'un' would cancel each other, and the revised sentence 'I wouldn't say he's the nicest guy around, but I've seen him behave kindly before.'