The answer that I came with was, had an interest in the success of Rome, since they could improve their status by demonstrating their loyalty to their conquerors. I just learned about this over the summer semester when I took western civilization. Roman is rich in history but then again I think all countries are. :)
In the two poems, the journey is a metaphor for life and passage into afterlife. In Ulysses Tennyson talks about how his life is nearing its end and how he's old now while in crossing the bar he talks about dying and going into afterlife. Both poems use the motif of journey on open seas to describe venturing into the unknown, that is, how life passes quickly as a journey does and the next stop on the journey is afterlife.
They were examples of US policies designed to curb the spread of communism.
Explanation:
- The domino effect or domino theory is a Cold War political term first used publicly by US President Dwight Eisenhower in 1954.
- During the Cold War, Western countries, and especially the United States, assumed a sudden territorial expansion of the Soviet Union and communist ideology. Domino theory assumes that in the event of a country falling into "communist hands", all its neighbors fall under its influence and in the short term also become communist. As dominoes, all the countries of that region would become communist and communism would spread uncontrollably.
- The Truman Doctrine is a US foreign policy plan to stop the spread of communism by giving Turkey and Greece economic aid.
- Marshall plan was the official plan of the United States to rebuild post-war Europe and counter the impact of communism after World War II.
Learn more on Cold War on
brainly.com/question/1287649
brainly.com/question/977566
#learnwithBrainly
Laws passed through congress have a direct impact on the court system, since it changes the way courts have to rule on the law. The Supreme court allows the court system to have some say in what laws are just by appealing their agreement with the constitution. The President doesn't directly pass laws, he has the power to veto congressional laws and through his endorsement behind them, but doesn't actually have the power to write, create or pass new laws himself, even if he's the one who technically signs them into law. As such, the supreme court checks the president less often than congress, because the president's actions affect the court's sphere of interest less often. Most interaction between the president and the court happen when the President heavily endorses a bill, gets it passed through congress, and then the court checks it. Some great examples are the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Recovery Administration, which were created through bills sponsored by Franklin Roosevelt as part of his New Deal reforms. The court struck them down as unconstitutional for various reasons, much to the dismay of FDR. In modern times, Obamacare almost had it's individual mandate requirement stuck down by the court a few years ago and elements of President Trump's muslim travel ban were struck down by the supreme court just in the last month.
I want to say C because of the ship ports
