What is NATO?

History

1 answer:

pishuonlain [190]1 year ago

6 0

Option A. a military alliance made up of multinational democracies .

Explanation:

The western alliance was formalised into an organization the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation ( NATO ) , which came into existence in April 1949. It was an association of twelve states known as multinational democracies.
Whicj declaref that armed attack on any one of them in Europe or Noth America would be regarded as an attack on all of them .
Each of these would be obliged to help each other.

With the breakage of warsaw pact , the countries of East Europe also joined NATO as a result of which its number has gone up to 28 and Russia is its participatory member.

You might be interested in

What is the impact of Cooper v. aaron

seraphim [82]

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruled that the state of Arkansas couldn't pass legislation undermining the Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education that Racial Segregation in public schools is unconstitutional.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST>>>HURRY PLEASE

KengaRu [80]

Answer

the first on what he said he prevented enslaved persons from buy their own freedom

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

congress passed the --------to pervent another showdown between a presidential and vice-president candidate

gtnhenbr [62]

12th Amendment......................

8 0

2 years ago

What circumstances might lead to people's rights being denied in a direct democracy

Harrizon [31]

Direct democracy is when everyone in a country votes on something. People's rights might be denied because it would be a tyrannical rule of the majority. For example, there's only 15% African-Americans in the US. If the 85% Caucasian population decided to vote something that was against the rights of the African-Americans, they wouldn't be able to oppose this because they would be a minority.

4 0

2 years ago

Define political polarization as it applies to the Supreme Court.

atroni [7]

There are no options to arrive at the correct solution. I would answer this question from my research and hope that it comes to your help. Political polarization as it applies to the Supreme Court is when one justice refuses to work with the other justices on the bench. It starts acting like a political institution and it is not good.

7 0

2 years ago