Both poems compare man-made things to natural things. So that both of them deals with nature. They describe how the wildness and slovenliness could take over such vast area. Whatever you do in the nature, even if you want to change something, the things you do will return to the nature and stay in there, again. The objects which the authors write about in the poems show that the nature will dominate them with its power.
The two pieces deal with nature. They both describe how the wildness and slovenliness could take over such vast area. No matter what you put in a place dominated by nature, untamed, in no time will the object(s) you placed they will soon belong to nature itself. Like the piles of bodies stated in Sandburg's "Grass" or the jar in Stevens' "The Anecdote of the Jar", a once wild object will soon be overpowered and dominated by its surroundings.
It makes the most sense because you don't know what horror is about to happen or maybe it isn't horror at all. The second don't make no sense because there's too little info. The third one doesn't make sense because you don't know the situation.
The early method of nominating political candidates required people to hold meetings to discuss the positives and negatives of candidates is called WARD meeting by card carrying members which is done by majority nomination via simple voting system among the ward members of the party at ward level
