Depends on your view, this is an opinion-based question, so there is no right or wrong answer.
Here is my opinion: I think that the U.S should have declared war to Mexico. First, I believe that Texas was a territory that belonged to the U.S, as Mexican General Antonio Lopez signed a treaty that gave the U.S the right to annex Texas. Furthermore, most people that lived in Texas wanted to be part of the United States. Like democracy given to those in the Kansas-Nebraska territory years later, to decide whether they should be a free state or a slave state, the people should decide what they want to do with their state.
Second, I hold the view that the war is rational because expansionism is done in peaceful ways, but Mexico refused to be peaceful and immediately resorted to war. President James Polk wanted to expand the U.S, but Mexico refused to give up Texas. Today, we have Texas as a result of this war.
Answer:
B. Must be appointed by the President and approved by Senate
Explanation:
In the case of the appointment of the federal justices in the United States of America, there is a single requirement which could be found in the constitution.
<em>This requirement is about the need for the Judge to be appointed by the President of US which would be confirmed and ratified by the US Senate. An example is the Supreme Court Judge recently appointed and approve by the Senate.</em>
In simple terms “judicial independence” is a matter of trust: ... Judicial independence is important to you because it guarantees that judges are free to decide honestly and impartially, in accordance with the law and evidence, without concern or fear of interference, control, or improper influence from anyone.
Policies that would allow the use and manufacture of alcohol and the ownership of slaves.
