3.
ninths=1/9
1/3 is equal to 3/9.
so (1/9)*3 = 3/9
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
13. Let A = the amount of money in the given time, P = principal amount; the amount of money you start with, T = time in years, R = interest rate, and N = amount of times interest is compounded each year.
The formula for compound interest is:

Now, we find in the information from the description needed to plug in. P = $1000, R = 7% or 0.07, N = 1 time a year, T = 3 years

This simplifies to:

And again to:

Plug this into a calculator:
A = 1225.043 or ≈1,225.04
14. (x² + 3)(x - 3)(x + 3)
I'm going to do FOIL method on the second and third binomials first and simplify. This gives you:
(x² + 3)(x² - 9)
Then you do the FOIL method again to get:
x⁴ - 9x² + 3x² - 27
And combine like terms for your answer:
x⁴ - 6x² - 27
Number 15 doesn't give you a number to set the polynomial (that results from multiplying those two binomials) equal to so I'm guessing it wants you to set said polynomial equal to zero and solve for x then plug back in.
If not, your area is found by the equation 3x² - 5x - 12
Answer:
100
Step-by-step explanation:
100 is the lowest number 50 and 20 both go into.
Answer:
25
Step-by-step explanation:
As the triangles within the bigger triangle are similar, the sides are in proportion.
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 3w = 75
⇒ w = 25