Answer:
it is option c mate. hope u got ur answer
Because America was angry with the Japanese for bombing peral harbor! Hope this helps
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, the question is incomplete because it does not provide what kind of debate it is referring to, or who were their protagonists.
However, we can comment on the following.
As we do not know what debate the question is referring to, lets put an example when a candidate did not provide hard data or back it up
with strong reasons and evidence.
In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone. He told that they were a threat to America. It was a simple accusation just to enrage their followers. He did not prove it with serious data. Indeed, the Media published that there had been many more crimes committed by American citizens that immigrants. But what the candidate wanted to create was a sentiment of hate to support its platform against immigration.
Answer:
The Battle of Iwo Jima
Explanation:
The US invasion, called Operation Detachment, aimed to conquer the island, including its three airports, <u>to use the region as a base to launch more effective attacks on the main Japanese islands. </u>Disregarding the controversies behind this invasion, the Battle of Iwo Jima is one of the most bloody conflicts in the War of Pacific.
<span>The League of Nations was set up by the Treaty of Versailles. Its aims were to stop wars, encourage disarmament, and make the world a better place by improving people's working conditions, and by tackling disease.</span>
