1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedbober [7]
2 years ago
10

Why was a weak national government created under the Articles of Confederation?

History
2 answers:
Fynjy0 [20]2 years ago
6 0
<span>The 13 states were wary of a British-style government.</span>
7nadin3 [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Under the Articles of Confederation, there was a weak national government. This was because the 13 states were wary of a British-style government.

Explanation:

Since the war against Great Britain was still going on, the settlers did not want to establish another powerful national government. With the zeal to protect its new independence, the Continental Congress created a weak unicameral structure that protected the freedom of the member states. Although Congress regulated monetary and military matters, the Articles had not designed any mechanism to ensure that each State complied with the troops and the money that was needed. This weakened the army, as was the case in 1781 and which George Washington would make patent in a letter to the Governor of Massachusetts, John Hancock.

The states did not want an one-person centralized government, because they feared that it would become a tyranny, as had happened with the British monarchy. Therefore, they determined that a Congress formed by representatives of each state would exercise executive power.

You might be interested in
Why is Marbury v. Madison an important decision in U.S. history?
abruzzese [7]

Marbury v. Madison is important as it established judicial review. I've written about it a few times on here today, so will work in other answers. John Adams tried to game the process and nominated Marbury to a post in the final hours of Adams' administration. The hitch was that the Secretary of State had to deliver a commission to make it official. Thomas Jefferson's Secretary of State, James Madison (future President), refused to deliver the commission.

Marbury, who was denied the post, sued.

The outcome of the case is a little murky for casual readers. In essence, though, Marbury still got hosed. He was told that he should have received the commission and that Madison was wrong but that the actual act by which he was nominated wasn't properly constructed.

So, the Supreme Court won the day by reviewing the actions of the other branches and poor Marbury got nothing.

4 0
2 years ago
3. What resources were the United States trying to gain from haiti​
Semmy [17]

<u><em>Answer:</em></u>

<u><em>The Haitian Revolution and the subsequent emancipation of Haiti as an independent state provoked mixed reactions in the United States. Among many white Americans this led to uneasiness, instilling fears of racial instability on its own soil and possible problems with foreign relations and trade between the two countries; among enslaved black Americans it fueled hope that the principles of the recent American Revolution might be realized in their own liberation.</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em>One outcome of the Haitian Revolution for the US was the Louisiana Purchase. Having lost his control of the Caribbean landholding, Napoleon saw no further use for Louisiana. The US was only interested in the New Orleans area; however, the revolution enabled the sale of the entire territory west of the Mississippi River for around $15 million. This purchase more than doubled US territory.</em></u>

<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the impact of scarcity on economic decision making. What happens when products and resources become less available
Vilka [71]

Answer:

their will be lack of want for the society

8 0
2 years ago
Exit Question | Why did the colonists react so strongly to the<br> Stamp Act?
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

The colonists felt that the British government had no right to tax them because there were not any representatives of the colonies in the British Parliament. The colonies had no say in how much the taxes should be or what they should pay for.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Due to the Red Scare, immigrants from these two regions of Europe were strongly opposed by many Americans.
alexgriva [62]
"Eastern" and "Central" were the two <span>regions of Europe among the following choices given in the question that </span><span>were strongly opposed by many Americans, due to Red Scare. The correct options among all the options that are given in the question are options "B" and "C". I hope that the answer has come to your help.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which describes Japan in the 1920s?
    14·1 answer
  • Why do citizens have a responsibility to participate in matters of the government?
    10·2 answers
  • President George bush's popularity fell in 1991 and 1992 mainly because of...
    5·2 answers
  • What two forces led to african american suffrage and public service despite southern?
    13·1 answer
  • How did european imperialism contrbute to the state of world war 1?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following characteristics was required to be a citizen of Athens
    7·1 answer
  • At the Philadelphia Convention, the delegates agreed to
    10·2 answers
  • Colombia was named after:<br> -mineral<br> -plants<br> -an explorer<br> -trees
    8·1 answer
  • What country did Gandhi help India fight independence from?
    15·1 answer
  • The majority of Americans supported the federal government funding the development and maintenance of the National Road.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!