1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
devlian [24]
3 years ago
14

What was one difference between the civil rights act of 1957 and the civil rights act of 1964

History
1 answer:
abruzzese [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

One difference discrimination

Explanation:

What I mean by this in 1954 the Brown V EDU was made and this was to desegregate the black and white community in school.

Which lead to the acts in 1957

In 1964 the people ended actual discrimination across the board. School, work, public place, transit, and anywhere you could think of.

This does not mean every one followed this type of stuff we have seen racist in modern society but a huge step for the black community

You might be interested in
Which of following is not a power or responsibility of president?
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

Explanation:

president. Which of the following best describes the makeup of the legislature in the ... Because of the constitutional duties of the Senate,

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1938, congress established the house un-american activities committee, which: question 11 options:
Nat2105 [25]
It included liberals and unionist in its meaning of "un-American". The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was made in 1938 to examine charged traitorousness and subversive exercises with respect to private natives, open workers, and those associations associated with having Communist ties.
8 0
3 years ago
What do you think might happen if there were no limits on civil liberties
Dennis_Churaev [7]
Civil war every day.
would result in anarchy.

everyone's house would probably be their own country.

I'm being serious. no limits means people can do whatever the heck they like
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a reason for the rise in democracy in Latin America?
Galina-37 [17]
The best option would be that "<span>The U.S. imposed a treaty that forced Latin American countries to democratize or face crippling sanctions," since it was never in American's best interest to force the democratization of the region. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
NEED NOW
laiz [17]

Woodrow Wilson and Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan came into office with little experience in foreign relations but with a determination to base their policy on moral principles rather than the selfish materialism that they believed had animated their predecessors' programs. Convinced that democracy was gaining strength throughout the world, they were eager to encourage the process. In 1916, the Democratic-controlled Congress promised the residents of the Philippine Islands independence; the next year, Puerto Rico achieved territorial status, and its residents became U.S. citizens. Working closely with Secretary of State Bryan, Wilson signed twenty-two bilateral treaties which agreed to cooling-off periods and outside fact-finding commissions as alternatives to war.


In a statement issued soon after taking office, Wilson declared that the United States hoped “to cultivate the friendship and deserve the confidence” of the Latin American states, but he also emphasized that he believed “just government” must rest “upon the consent of the governed.” Latin American states were hopeful for the prospect of being free to conduct their own affairs without American interference, but Wilson's insistence that their governments be democratic undermined the promise of self-determination. In 1915, Wilson responded to chronic revolution in Haiti by sending in American marines to restore order, and he did the same in the Dominican Republic in 1916. The military occupations that followed failed to create the democratic states that were their stated objective. In 1916, Wilson practiced an old-fashioned form of imperialism by buying the Virgin Islands from their colonial master, Denmark, for $25 million.



8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What caused the american revolution
    14·2 answers
  • Why was the Berlin Airlift successful in terms of the geography of Eastern Europe and East-West relations?
    5·1 answer
  • What is not characteristic of the Ku Klux Klan?
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the roads of the Roman Empire?
    10·1 answer
  • The Portuguese word for Baroque means which of the following?
    12·2 answers
  • Is the following sentence complete or incomplete?
    5·2 answers
  • One of the required steps for amending the constitution is
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the Temperance Movement start?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the Swahili Coast a center of trade? It was close to the Bantu homeland. It connected African cultures with traders from
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes Constantinople during the reign of Constantine?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!