The inference is that the details from the excerpt that best support the conclusion that children are the author's intended audience include:
the terms "kun" and "payah kun"
the use of animals to tell a magical story
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
It should be noted that the context clues are important to understand the story that's illustrated.
In this case, the inference is that the details from the excerpt that best support the conclusion that children are the author's intended audience include the terms "kun" and "payah kun" and the use of animals to tell a magical story.
These shows that the audience were children.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
D. A closed question, because you can only answer yes or no, there's no in between.
need more info on the question
Answer:
The answer is easy its the lack of petals. Because The sea rose lacks petals.
The sentences that best support the author's claim that Sinclair's book accomplished something different from what Sinclair had hoped are:
- But Sinclair was surprised that it was his horrific description of how meat was processed that caused the biggest uproar. (paragraph 3)
- Sinclair remarked, “I aimed at the public's heart and by accident I hit it in the stomach.” (paragraph 3)
<h3>Meaning of claim</h3>
- A claim is a belief that the author or writer of a text holds. The claim that Sinclair's book accomplished something different from what he hoped can be seen in the two statements.
- In the first one, he expressed his surprise that it was because of the horrific description that an uproar was caused. In the second sentence, he remarked that while he aimed for the public's heart, he hit their stomach.
Learn more about claims here:
brainly.com/question/14953192