Ok...
The changes in the last 10 years have been astronomical. The Microsoft Program has changed from a simple 20ghz computer (2001-2005). To a "simple" (quote from Bill Gates in his opening statement about the new 100ghz computer) 100ghz gaming hp intel power microsoft windows cpu. The changes in this last 10 to 20 years has been amazing! Alas, some of the "new" changes of this time have come at a "price." For example, the new president of the United States, Donald Trump, his election could be a good thing for America. Unfortunately, since the election of him, the country has been at a up rise against the election of the president. The change that could be good for America, has its good and bad consequences.
A good thing that has changed since the "old days" is the one and only technology. Technology has perks and quirks, but the perks out weigh the quirks by a ton. Technology has changed so much that what we didn't have in 2004, a simple 100ghz gaming hp intel power microsoft windows cpc, is now out and can be used for the people of today.
Change is a good thing, but to much change could be bad also. If we just had the right amount of change when we need it things could go just right.
H0P3 It H3LPS :)
Answer:
Under the Florida constitution, Florida voters have the power to recall any state official from his or her position initiate laws and hold referendums on existing laws change the state legislature to a unicameral system amend the state constitution only once per year.
Unless there are specific choices I can only offer you a list of potential answers.
Sherman Act (1890), Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), and the Clayton Act (1914).
The Sherman Act outlawed all forms of monopolization and any attempts to do so. It also set strict penalties for any and all violations of this law.
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 created the Federal Trade Commission which oversaw national business practices.
The Clayton Act addresses more specific points but especially focuses on preventing monopolies through regulation of mergers and acquisitions. It also goes on to prevent discriminatory pricing and dealings.
Further reading can be found on:
https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.
Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.
A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.
In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.
Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy, the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.
A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.
If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.
There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.
Answer:
Raw materials than england taxed!
Explanation:
England usually taxed many things from the 13 colonies, and ik that these were some of them! It's a small part of what made the colonists so mad and caused them to rebel.
I hope this helped!
