Answer: You know no perception of others thoughts or feelings. Only the narrator, or main character.
What the author seems to be trying to say here is that there is always somebody that will be unhappy with what a leader has to say.
In a healthy society, there are always opposing views that are designed to be discussed and debated at length. The eternal problem is that unfortunately, you can't please everybody.
Political correctness is a very controversial subject in that some people feel limited and unable to express views that may cause harm and damage to others. They claim that society holds them back from speaking their mind. It is very difficult to apply one definition to this concept as a whole because it is definitely influenced by your position on the matter.
It seems here that the question is designed to include your own analysis and a bit of your opinion, so be sure to add this as well as factual and generalized information.
Answer:
Explanation:
The essay initially pretends to be a critique of a type of self-improvement book popular at the time, which claimed to tell how to achieve success. These books defined success strictly in financial terms and assumed that if anyone follows certain steps, they will be able to duplicate the accomplishments of wealthy business owners. However, Chesterton’s review of these books includes a broader social criticism. The focus on the definition of success strictly in terms of money is central to his essay. But wrapped around that issue is the idea that each person can or should perceive success on the same terms as a business leader. He illustrates the point by saying a donkey is successful at being a donkey as much as a millionaire is successful at being a millionaire, so there is no point in calling a donkey a failed millionaire or vice versa.
To counter the common assumptions about success, Chesterton describes people in various walks of life and how each might more realistically succeed. In this description, he suggests that these books falsely pretend to help people succeed in their own social circles and encourage people to try to become something they are not and cannot ever be.
Chesterton says these writers tell the ordinary man how he may succeed in his career—if he is a builder, he may succeed as a builder; or if he is a stockbroker, he may succeed as a stockbroker. Chesterton increases his satire at this point, commenting that the authors say a grocer may become a sporting yachtsman; a tenth-rate journalist may become a peer, which is a British nobleman; and a German Jew may become an Anglo-Saxon. Obviously, these transitions are unlikely or even impossible. Chesterton then criticizes the main assumption of these books and the society that produces it. By claiming that average people can follow in the steps of business tycoons such as Rothschild or Vanderbilt, the book's author is taking part in "the horrible mysticism of money," in which people worship the unlikely possibility of achieving great riches.
Answer:
a leap like a flash a metallic clip of teeth and whenever it fell upon me my blood ran cold and is that from telltale heart
Explanation:
