Answer:
i honestly don't know
i kbow alot of people ill ask to see if i can get the answer.
The correct answer for above statement is:
It is the division of powers between a national government and the state governments" is the best option in terms of the description of federalism, on which the US government is based.
Explanation:
Federalism is the combined or composite method of government, connecting a global management (the central or 'federal' government) with provincial governments (provincial, state, cantonal, regional or other sub-unit governments) in a single political system. Its distinguishing feature, represented in the founding example of modern federalism by the United States of America under the Constitution of 1787, is a relationship of parity between the two levels of management established. It can thus be defined as a form of government in which there is a separation of powers between two levels of administration of equal rank
Answer:
The answer is Option C: The countries agreed to divide Germany into four zones of occupation.
Explanation:
The Yalta Conference was held on February 4 to 11, 1945. It was a meeting between the leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union to discuss what would occur with Germany in the postwar reorganization and the rest of Europe. The allies also agreed that Germany would undergo demilitarization and that the nazis would be prevented from remaining active or organized. Stalin insisted on maintaining control of Poland but that he would allow free elections.
The war caused the united states to enter another severe depression
the united states became the most richest powerful nation in the world
Answer:
Governments can be run and managed well or poorly based on leaders in charge- look at explanation
Explanation:
A government can usually dictate to some degree what people do. So if the government passes a law that bans a certain race or gender from doing a certain thing, whether it be applying for a job, or eating at a certain restaurant, then the government is limiting human rights. This, morally to us as a modern society as seen as a bad thing because it judges people based on things they cannot change, instead of things people can change like attitude or character. Now lets say a government decided to pass a law that provided healthcare or education for its people. This would be a good thing because people who become educated or maintain their health will most likely be beneficial to the society that they are a part of.
