1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qwelly [4]
3 years ago
14

Sutton breaks into a house when the owner is away and looks for valuable items to steal. However, he does not find anything wort

h taking and leaves. The owner returns later and does not notice anything amiss, nor even realize that the house was entered. How will Sutton's offense be recorded?
Social Studies
1 answer:
ser-zykov [4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Sutton's offense will not be recorded because it is part of what is called the dark figure of the crime.

Explanation:

In the field of criminology or sociology, the dark figure of the crime can be defined as the number of crimes that have not been reported or discovered.

Just as many reported crimes are seen daily and investigations to find out who has committed it, there are also times where crimes cannot be proven due to lack of evidence or perhaps they happened but were never reported.

Situations have been seen where innocent people are convicted of poor evidence or people who are guilty but lack of evidence cannot ensure that the person is guilty. There are also cases where there are crimes that are not reported because the person does not trust justice or the person may feel guilty for what happened to him.

In the case of Sutton, although it is true that at the end of the day he did not steal anything and that the owner of the house could not detect anything because everything was intact, this does not mean that the crime did not happen. If the owner of the house had security cameras or found Sutton in the house, it would have been proof that he was trying to steal even if he didn't carry anything.

If Sutton had been found there would be chances of being imprisoned or other judicial actions would have been taken because entering a house without permission and that is a crime.

You might be interested in
Which political party opposed the amendment?<br> o Republicans<br> Democrats
Len [333]
The Democrats opposed the amendments
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What is solar system.
serg [7]

Answer:

The solar system consists of the sun as well as everything that orbits around it including the planets, their moons, comets asteroids and more.

- water pollution

- deforestation

- erosion

- contamination of nearby streams

- change of soil

Order nearest from the sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The ten tribes discussed laced by the Assyrians become known as the “lost tribes of Judah.”
Artemon [7]

yes it is very true..............

4 0
3 years ago
What would reflect israel’s mixed economy?
konstantin123 [22]
<span>The correct answer is a combination of privately-owned businesses and government regulations. In a mixed economy, the government allows for private businesses to supply certain goods. However, the government is involved in supplying critical goods such as in the utility sector. It can also intervene when need arises.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
6. Nancy is a writer for a well-known city newspaper. She is writing an article about one of the Congressional candidates. Havin
zlopas [31]

Answer:    The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel

Explanation:  The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which method of processing your notes will allow you to test your knowledge of the course material?
    13·2 answers
  • Collective ownership by all the people of the factories, mills, mines, railroads, land, and all other instruments of production.
    12·2 answers
  • What is the world talest building?
    6·2 answers
  • What aspects of the New Deal, if any, do you see in American society today?
    5·1 answer
  • Homo naledi is a newly discovered species of the genus Homo. It is similar to Homo erectus, but contains unique enough character
    5·1 answer
  • What is the important of computer productivity tools
    5·1 answer
  • People who are self-employed don't have deductions. true false
    13·2 answers
  • ASAP NEED AN ANSWER ASAP!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • What seasons are characteristic of a monsoon climate
    10·2 answers
  • What new parties were created leading to the election of 1824?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!