All of them: Poll taxes, literacy tests, and grandfather clauses have in common that: C. <span>They were restrictions placed on Confederate voters. Hope this can help</span>
Relative deprivation, specifically intense competition for jobs, commodities and housing;
group processes, including psychological categorisation processes that are nationalistic rather than superordinate.
South African exceptionalism, or a feeling of superiority in relation to other Africans; and.
The answer is <u>"impersonation".</u>
Impersonation is when a person assumes the role of somebody you are probably going to trust or obey convincingly enough to trick you into enabling access to your office, to data, or to your data frameworks. This sort of social engineering plays on our common propensities to trust that individuals are who they say they are, and to take after guidelines when asked by a specialist figure. It includes the conscious manipulation of a casualty to acquire data without the individual understanding that a security rupture is happening.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The question is demanding from the respondent to use the concept of symbolic interactionism to explain the difference that is evident between norms that are followed in different settings.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The norms that are followed by people in day to day life change according to the setting that the people live in. These norms are based on cultural beliefs, traditions, the social build-up of the society, etc.
- Most common norms followed by the people in different settings are associated with routine living. These norms are generally applicable to all the elements of society.
Could it change? Yes. Was it likely? No. The easiest way social class could change was to be a woman and marry someone of a higher class. This was still rare as noble families required doweries to keep their wealth. Marrying a poor woman would not really accomplish that. Marriage for love was not as common back then as it is today. For men it was more difficult. Joining the Catholic Church as a priest one could rise the ranks if you were smart enough to play Church politics and reach a status of cardinal. Also warfare and plunder could allow one to amass wealth and marry into wealthier families if you had enough gold and people feared you enough. If you were a peasant farmer you were more likely to die a peasant farmer as would your children grandchildren etc. The Middle Ages was not a capitalistic system. There was no buying your way or earning your way to the top. Social hierarchy was much stricter and solid in those days. So In the end, Was it possible to move up a class? Yes. Was it probable? No.
