1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tom [10]
3 years ago
15

What could julius caesar have done to show his enemies he wasn't abusing his power

History
1 answer:
8090 [49]3 years ago
8 0
There were numerous things. For starters, he could've resigned and showed that he doesn't plan to become a dictator. In addition, Romans were all about outward appearance and social status and much of Caesar's behavior towards the high ranking senate members was humiliating to them so they naturally loathed him. He could've given them more respect in order to gain their support.
You might be interested in
What was one of the goals of President Clinton’s unsuccessful Health Security Act?
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

C.  to develop a Contract with America that guaranteed health care

Explanation:

<em>This is because, Clinton has always wanted to give every American health security—health care that's always there and cannot be taken away.</em>

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. The Romans believed that all their wars were just wars." Do you think they were? Do you think
Rudik [331]

Explanation:

The just war theory is a largely Christian philosophy that attempts to reconcile three things:

taking human life is seriously wrong

states have a duty to defend their citizens, and defend justice

protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values sometimes requires willingness to use force and violence

The theory specifies conditions for judging if it is just to go to war, and conditions for how the war should be fought.

Although it was extensively developed by Christian theologians, it can be used by people of every faith and none.

Purpose

The aim of Just War Theory is to provide a guide to the right way for states to act in potential conflict situations. It only applies to states, and not to individuals (although an individual can use the theory to help them decide whether it is morally right to take part in a particular war).

Just War Theory provides a useful framework for individuals and political groups to use for their discussions of possible wars.

The theory is not intended to justify wars but to prevent them, by showing that going to war except in certain limited circumstances is wrong, and thus motivate states to find other ways of resolving conflicts.

'Just', or merely 'permissible'?

The doctrine of the Just War can deceive a person into thinking that because a war is just, it's actually a good thing.

But behind contemporary war theory lies the idea that war is always bad. A just war is permissible because it's a lesser evil, but it's still an evil.

Origins

The principles of a Just War originated with classical Greek and Roman philosophers like Plato and Cicero and were added to by Christian theologians like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas.

Elements

There are two parts to Just War theory, both with Latin names:

Jus ad bellum: the conditions under which the use of military force is justified.

Jus in bello: how to conduct a war in an ethical manner.

A war is only a Just War if it is both justified, and carried out in the right way. Some wars fought for noble causes have been rendered unjust because of the way in which they were fought.

3 0
2 years ago
Use this map to answer the following question:
olasank [31]
I believe the answer would be A. Bay of Bengal. But not completely sure.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.Who did Theodora argue on behalf of for more rights?
Vladimir79 [104]
Theodora argued with her husband Justinian the 1st for more rights for the people, especially women.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is economic equity an important goal for our government? If so, why? If not, why not?
aliina [53]

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

Economic equity simply Mena's fairness. It is the function of every government to promote economic equity in the society.

This is a vital goal for the government as everyone should be treated equally and fairly as no one is above the other in the society.

Some of the ways that the government can promote economic equity is provision of infrastructural facilities for everyone in the society and not only the people in the urban areas. Those in rural areas shouldn't be left out.

Government can also redistribute income so that there can be a reduction between the gap that exists between the rich and those that are not financially bouyant. This can be done through taxation.

Economic equity is vital as it helps in the improvement of the standard of living of the people and the growth and development of a country.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are three countries that became communist following World War II?
    7·2 answers
  • In the late 1700s and early 1800s, the United States’ desire for respect as a new nation created tension with
    11·2 answers
  • The colonists’ slogan, “No taxation without representation,” expressed a belief in
    13·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    8·2 answers
  • Which view was NOT included in John Locke's Two Treatises of Government (1690)?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the main goal of the Farmers’ Alliance?
    14·1 answer
  • According ancient greek, who invented musical instruments
    8·1 answer
  • Which principle in the Constitution divides authority between three branches of government?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Indian Self-Determination Act affect Native American tribes?
    12·1 answer
  • Which factors played a role in Chinese immigration in the late 1800s?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!