Explanation:
<h3>Technically, photography has changed in that digital imaging has matured and advanced image making creativeness possibilities and quality beyond what most people could conceive 20 years ago.</h3>
<h3>Professionally, the advent of easy to use digital cameras and unlimited shooting for essentially free has basically destroyed the professional photographers’ ability to charge a relatively living wage for work. A few still command decent prices, but the digitization has created commoditization, which alway equals pricing deterioration.</h3>
<h3>The way we view images has changed from open and inviting prints on refrigerators, desks and walls; to email snap shots that must be opened to participate and that we invest 5 seconds in viewing before terminating them.</h3>
<h3>As with every industry that has been impacted by digitization, great disruption has occurred. Sometimes for the better as in expanding the top one percent of creatives and in potential image quality. Most times in diluting image quality by diluting the talent pool with mediocre uncommitted practitioners. (Like adding water to good wine, the more water the less desirable the wine. Taste, personality, and care are wasted by the dilution.)</h3>
<h3>Socially, the so called democratization of photography through digital has diluted the commitment to quality image making. Many people are just happy to get an image, even when they are beyond mediocre.</h3>
<h2>
<u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u>Confirm</u><u>.</u><u> </u></h2><h2>
<u>#Brainliest</u><u> </u><u>Answer</u><u> </u></h2>
I think this is a pretty easy question to answer yourself. Think about anything that your parents or siblings or anyone really in your life who is an adult has done for you and ways you can gives thanks and show your gratitude towards them. It’s not difficult
The answer to the statement given is False.
Sigmund Freud is known for his psychoanalysis approaches which direct the focus to the mind – specifically putting more weight on the unconscious and how we create defense mechanisms in response to what’s going on in the deep recesses of the consciousness.
His primary methodology in studying this phenomenon was not through laboratory studies – this approach is instead favored by the Behaviorists – those who are much concerned in observing exhibited behaviors instead of the mind. This group includes B. F. Skinner, Albert Bandura, and Ivan Pavlov.
Answer: A.) 8
Explanation:
Use u-substitution.
(1) Let u=x^3
By the power rule, du/dx=3x^2
Multiplying by dx and dividing by three, we have du/3=x^2dx
To find the new lower bound of integration, plug the old bound, -3, for x in equation (1). We get u=(-3)^3= -27
Similarly, when the upper bound 3 is plugged in, u=27
Now, replacing f(x^3) with f(u) and x^2dx with du/3:
![\int\limits^{3}_{-3} {x^2f(x^3)} \, dx= \int\limits^{27}_{-27} \frac{f(u)}3 \, du \\=\frac{1}3\left[\int\limits^{0}_{-27} {f(u)} \, du+\int\limits^{27}_{0} {f(u)} \, du \right] (2)\\Observe:\int\limits^{0}_{-27} {f(u)} \, du=\int\limits^{27}_{0} {f(u)} du\; \text{ because f(x) is an even function}\\\text{Substitute the left hand side integral for the RHS in equation (2):}\\=\frac{1}3\left[2\int\limits^{27}_0 {f(u)} du\right]\\=\frac{1}3 (2)(12)=8](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B3%7D_%7B-3%7D%20%7Bx%5E2f%28x%5E3%29%7D%20%5C%2C%20dx%3D%20%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B27%7D_%7B-27%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf%28u%29%7D3%20%5C%2C%20du%20%5C%5C%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D3%5Cleft%5B%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B0%7D_%7B-27%7D%20%7Bf%28u%29%7D%20%5C%2C%20du%2B%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B27%7D_%7B0%7D%20%7Bf%28u%29%7D%20%5C%2C%20du%20%5Cright%5D%20%282%29%5C%5CObserve%3A%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B0%7D_%7B-27%7D%20%7Bf%28u%29%7D%20%5C%2C%20du%3D%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B27%7D_%7B0%7D%20%7Bf%28u%29%7D%20du%5C%3B%20%5Ctext%7B%20because%20f%28x%29%20is%20an%20even%20function%7D%5C%5C%5Ctext%7BSubstitute%20the%20left%20hand%20side%20integral%20for%20the%20RHS%20in%20equation%20%282%29%3A%7D%5C%5C%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D3%5Cleft%5B2%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B27%7D_0%20%7Bf%28u%29%7D%20du%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D3%20%282%29%2812%29%3D8)
since the value of the first integral of the question = 12, which is given. Although the variable is different than the given (u instead of x), it's still the same integral
