1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NNADVOKAT [17]
3 years ago
14

Who was to blame for the death of reconstruction?

History
1 answer:
rosijanka [135]3 years ago
8 0
Both but more to the South. 

How the North killed the reconstruction.
- The North gave up on the South
- The North stopped trying
- They become too involved with their own problems

How the South killed the reconstruction.
- The South rebelled against the North
- The South refused to accept any changes made.
- Any steps are taken to move forward with reconstruction the South would be rejected.

The South is more to blame.
-No matter what the North tried, the South would refuse to make any changes.-They killed many innocent lives.-They put in more effort in fighting and resisting reconstruction.
You might be interested in
Many americans have questioned whether fighting the korean war was worthwhile. what is your opinion and why?
Brilliant_brown [7]
Korea was ruled by Japan<span> from 1910 until the closing days of </span>World War II<span>. In August 1945, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan, as a result of an agreement with the United States, and liberated Korea north of the </span>38th parallel<span>. U.S. forces subsequently moved into the south. By 1948, as a product of the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States, Korea was split into two regions, with separate governments. Both governments claimed to be the legitimate government of all of Korea, and neither side accepted the border as permanent. The conflict escalated into open warfare when North Korean forces—supported by the Soviet Union and China—moved into the south on 25 June 1950.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What are some similarities and differences between the Magna Carta, Declaration of Independence, and Bill of Rights?
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

Similarities:

-The two documents are popular in their countries of origin with the Magna Carta being popular in Britain and the Declaration being popular in the United States.

- The documents were both borne out of rebellion; the Magna Carta was first established after conflicts between the King and rebel barons and the Declaration was established after conflict between the thirteen American states and Great Britain.

-The two documents both sought to assert individual human freedoms and rights.

Differences:

- Where the Declaration confirms that power rests with the people, the Magna Carta asserted that power rests with the sovereign until changes through the Six Statutes sought to limit these powers.

- In the Magna Carta the rights of the people are granted by the government while in the Declaration, people's rights are God given. The Declaration was based on universal principles regarding all human beings but the Magna Carta was based on a particular group of people (barons) but which was later changed to the more inclusive term any freeman.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What solutions to the problems facing farmers did the Populist movement propose? You need at least one paragraph
Lera25 [3.4K]

The challenges that many American farmers faced in the last quarter of the nineteenth century were significant. They contended with economic hardships born out of rapidly declining farm prices, prohibitively high tariffs on items they needed to purchase, and foreign competition. One of the largest challenges they faced was overproduction, where the glut of their products in the marketplace drove the price lower and lower

6 0
3 years ago
After the civil war which president was called a "carpetbagger"?
Akimi4 [234]

b.Johnson

Soon after the death of Lincoln, the war ended in 1865, as Andrew Johnson took the lead of the country trying to conciliate with the South. This caused a movement of people to the South, where within a year, they regained the power they had previously lost with the war. Naturally, the term carpetbagger is peyoraitve,and it was referred to Johnson and his Republican companions seen as opportunists. They plan was to be elected after the civil war came to an end. They sought approval from the South, where they were rather unpopular. The word is still sometimes in use in the United States referring to candidates for elections presented by their political parties in electoral areas with few or non-existent popularity.

4 0
3 years ago
Manifest destiny was the belief that the United States should
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

da

Explanation:

da

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Increasing feelings of nationalism among many groups led to which<br> consequence after World War I?
    6·1 answer
  • In order to obtain full time employment, you must complete 500 hours. You are scheduled to work 40 hours per week. How many week
    13·1 answer
  • Who was washington acquired by
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the Americans start to side with French ?
    9·2 answers
  • States with the largest populations _____. send more representatives to the House send fewer representatives to the House have m
    6·2 answers
  • The creators of the constitution wanted to make sure that no future ________ could take away these rights from the citizens.
    15·1 answer
  • I DID IT !!!! FINALLY !!!!! now i just have to finish math and english ._. BUT I PASSED YESSSSS AHAHAHA
    10·2 answers
  • If you have an unwavering devotion to your country, this belief is defined as which of the following? A. idealism B.capitalism C
    12·2 answers
  • 1. Describe, using occupational titles, who Benjamin Banneker was.
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WITH THIS DISCUSSION
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!