The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
the answer is A they wouldn't receive salaries
Answer:
John Baker was an American militiaman who fought on the patriot side during the American Revolutionary War. His most prominent participation occurred in 1777, during the battle of Thomas Creek, in the northeast of the State of Florida, near the current city of Jacksonville.
In that battle, an American militia was ambushed by a large group of British soldiers. Baker, who was leading the Patriot group, managed to avoid the massacre through a defensive strategy that allowed the Patriots to escape to Georgia.
I believe the answer is :<span>The historian is placing the argument in historical context.
Argument with historical context would tried to explain a certain historical event based on </span>the social, political, religious, and economic conditions that existed during a certain time and place.In the example above, the historian choose to base her argument on religious conditions in the past.
Governments were forced to pay for food and shelter for poor refugees in their countries.
