Answer:
That's alot of words, kinda hard to understand
If you’re talking about the book ‘The Most Dangerous Game’, the answer is B, determined.
I’m sorry but this doesn’t make sense to me or am I too dumb to get this?
One hundred eight two million five hundred sixty eight thousand four hundred and eighty. Hope that helps :)
The first statement is Invalid Reasoning. Though a dog run would be a kind action towards dogs, it is not truly a valid point in justifying the construction of a dog run. It is not enough of a reason.
The second statement is also Invalid reasoning. The information is not relevant to the argument of building or not a dog run.
The third statement is Valid Reasoning. It states clearly an argument in favour of building a dog run.
The fourth statement is also Valid Reasoning. It explains a reason why the dog run is not really a priority, and would benefit only few citizens. It is a valid argument against the dog run
