Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
You didn't really provide us with any document? However, generally it can be said that the Roman empire was in a decline due to a series of bad rulers which were unable to keep the massive empire at the time together and maintain law, order, and at the same time keep up with the military advances of other barbarian tribes.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The Agricultural/Neolithic Revolution is when humans moved from nomadic hunter gatherer lifestyles to farming in one place. The Agricultural Revolution is believed to have began around 10,000 BC. This would mean it began about 12,000 years ago.
Answer:
FEDERALIST STRUCTURE IS A COMPOUND OF GOVERNMENTS. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT WORKING AND HAVE AUTHORITY OVER SAME AREA OF PEOPLE. HOPES THIS HELPS.
Explanation: