The question above is incomplete, the complete version is given below:
Read this excerpt from
"Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk."
I wonder, when I look at the
bombed out peasant hamlets, the orphans begging and stealing on the streets of
Saigon and the women and children with napalm burns lying on the hospital cots,
whether the United States or any nation has the right to inflict this suffering
and degradation on another people for its own ends.<span>
How do the allusions in this excerpt reinforce the meaning of the passage?</span>
The allusions clarify the geographic locations visited by the
author.
The allusions recall specific locations and horrors of the
Vietnam conflict.
The allusions question the Vietnamese for allowing such a
violent war.
<span>The allusions criticize the political philosophies that
encourage suffering.</span>
<span>ANSWER</span>
The correct option is this: THE ALLUSION CRITICIZE THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES THAT ENCOURAGE SUFFERING. Allusion is a figure of speech, which refers to an object or a circumstance from an external context. In the passage given above, the author is questioning the political morality behind war. War usually result in great suffering for all involved and the author is wondering, if is morally correct for countries to be settling their differences by mean of warfare.
I could see that my fire maker was having a hard time. But I gave him his space, because I wanted the warmth of the fire.
Answer:
In "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God", the speaker Jonathan Edwards describes the fate of sinners by saying that they would burn in hell if they did not repent from their sins and ask for forgiveness.
Explanation:
I'm not completely sure due to lack of info but I hope this is right
Answer:
1. Someone should send the email today.
2. The employees have left the documents behind.
3. They served the breakfast in the dining room.
4. Has anyone read the instruction?
5. Someone offered him a good job.
6. Someone had to call the ambulance.
7. The mechanics will repair my car next week.
8. Someone is breaking down the old bridge at this moment.
9. They said he is an excellent guitarist.
10. Open the windows.
11. My parents adviced me to get a visa.
12. Why did someone break the glass?
Explanation:
I used "someone" when the doer wasn't identified, I think you're free to use "you" or "them" depending on the situation.
Sentiences 3 and 8 because they express emotional thought other than fact. For sentence three, using "terrible waste" can be debateable and shows more of an opinion. And sentence 8, by using "shouldn't" showing its still a posssiby something can or can not happen.