What can be logically concluded about each option:
- <u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
- <u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
- <u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
- <em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
Answer:
us to stay motivated and get things done by reminding us that doing nothing only leads to lethargy
Explanation:
hes sick of staying still and wants to be able to move
Answer:
If someone entrusts you to write a speech for a wedding, it's more meaningful to write it yourself. Take inspiration but don't copy word for word. That takes the sentimentality away.
Answer:
The ones starting with "Why",and "
what"
Answer: True, Correlative conjunctions work in pairs to join words, phrases, or clauses.
Explanation: