It was better for growing crops. A stable climate ensured a surplus of agricultural produce during these phases, slowly leading to the evolution of cities.
Answer:
I will cite the independent Gallup opinion poll
Explanation:
Ethics is the ability of a person to take the right action in a given situation and reject wrong action.
In the given scenario where there are two opinion polls, one an independent on by Gallup and another by a partisan organisation.
The best option will be to cite the independent opinion poll by Gallup even if though it opposes your position.
You can however state solid facts that shows the relevance of your own position.
This gives the audience a transparent view of the facts and they can make decisions knowing they are not being lied to.
Answer:
C). Evolutionary.
Explanation:
'Evolutionary periods' are demonstrated as the higher periods that exist during darkness. This phase or period focuses on the behaviors associated with fear, biases, and associations as the outcome or consequence of the process of evolution.
As per the description, the 'evolutionary perspective' would assist in advancing the argument related to the 'sleep patterns' that have evolved as an outcome in the form of adaptive response to acquisitive risks. This perspective would assist in knowing that how such patterns have evolved and led to its present stage. Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
