Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
In the case when the information is precalled so here the sources that considered to be best should be the own salespeople as it would emphathize the situation of the sales person
So as per the given situation, the given statement is true
Hence, the option a is correct
Therefore, the second option is wrong
Answer:
There will be a difference in the income .
Absorption costing income will be lower as it transfers all the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
Variable costing income will be higher as it does not transfer the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
The difference will be of $ 104000
Explanation:
Increase in units 8000
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $24.00 $10.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 8.00 3.00
Total Unit Costs $ 32.00 $ 13.00
The net operating income under variable costing for the year will be $ 13* 8000= $ 104000 Lower than the net operating income under absorption costing. This is because the all fixed costs will be treated as period cost rather than product costs.
In variable costing the ending inventory will be $104000 lower than the ending inventory under absorption costing because the fixed costs will not be allocated to products.
Under variable costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32 each.Under absorption costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32+ $ 13= $ 45 each.
This transaction is called account allowance. Account allowance
includes two kinds of transactions – to reduce in the folio balance
compensation for poor service and the other one is to correct posting mistakes
after the close of business. This kind of transaction is recognized by the usage
of an allowance voucher, allowance vouchers are typically necessitate
management endorsement.
Answer: d. under the minimum-contacts test.
Explanation:
Cattle House Steaks, a Colorado company, enters into a contract over the phone with Beef Packing Inc., an out-of-state corporation. If a dispute arises, a Colorado court can exercise jurisdiction over Beef Packing under the minimum-contacts test.
Minimum contacts applies to situations whereby a court in one state can assert its personal jurisdiction over another defendant which isn't in that same state but is in another state.