1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hoa [83]
3 years ago
14

Why is the Mayflower Compact so important?

History
2 answers:
anastassius [24]3 years ago
6 0
The Mayflower Compact was important because it established rules and regulations and ways of life for the pilgrims that arrived in the Mayflower. Without it, there lives would have been very different and cluttered and confusing since no one would have known how to live the same way.
-Dominant- [34]3 years ago
6 0
<h2>The MayFlower Compact </h2>

The compact is that on 16th September, 1620, the Mayflower which was a British ship with 102 passengers who screamed wanderers. Mayflower compact is very important that it is explained as it was the government in the areas.

This government was the one which becomes first popular to be established. The people who lived in colonies accord to make their rules and to choose their leaders.  

You might be interested in
Restate the sense (idea or message) of the poem "Velvet Shoes" in a prose paraphrase without using figurative language.
tekilochka [14]
I believe the poem is attempting to state that we ought to all do our best to be white and immaculate and in the event that we as a whole are, then the whole world will be dressed in virtue. By giving the majority of our hush a chance to fill the place, it will keep on being a noiseless and impeccable world.
7 0
3 years ago
Why does Hamilton believe so strongly in the independence of the courts?
liberstina [14]

Answer:

please Mark as brainliest---

Explanation:

For me, this has been the summer of Alexander Hamilton—not because of Broadway’s hit musical, but because of Federalist 78, one of Hamilton’s greatest essays (and that’s grading on a steep curve), written in defense of the then-proposed Constitution’s framework for an independent judicial branch.

I had reason to return to the essay several times in recent months, in classes that I was fortunate to teach for the Hertog Foundation and the Hudson Institute, and in conversations that I’ve had recently with thoughtful Washington policymakers reflecting on the Supreme Court’s role in American government and society today. Written in 1788, Federalist 78 is famous (among lawyers, at least) for its description of the federal judiciary as “the least dangerous branch,” and for its defense of judicial independence and the constitutional power of “judicial review,” by which courts declare statutes unconstitutional. But teaching Hamilton’s essay and other Federalist Papers to students, and discussing it with friends and colleagues, I’m struck by how Hamilton’s most luminous lines overshadow some of the less well-remembered passages, as well as the broader context in which they were written. Today, more than ever, we should focus on these overshadowed aspects of Federalist 78. Americans are once again debating the Supreme Court’s role in American government and society, in light of Justice Antonin Scalia’s passing, the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace him, and years of controversial decisions from the Court on questions of free speech, religious liberty, same-sex marriage, executive power, regulatory overreach, and more. In these debates, we would do well to understand Federalist 78—and not just its famous lines.

The place to begin is a letter by “Brutus,” a pseudonymous critic of the then-proposed Constitution, in March 1788. (Historian Herbert Storing later included it as “Brutus No. 15” in his landmark collection of anti-Federalist papers.) Reacting to the Constitution’s proposal to give federal judges life tenure (that is, “during good behaviour”), removable by Congress only through impeachment, Brutus blasted the proposed federal judiciary in terms that seem familiar to modern debates:

The framers of this constitution appear to have followed that of the British, in rendering the judges independent, by granting them their offices during good behaviour,

4 0
4 years ago
How many senate votes does it take to approve a supreme court justice?
Burka [1]
I think it takes sixty votes to approve a supreme court justice
8 0
3 years ago
What was the last hurricane to hit florida?
olga_2 [115]
The most recent hurricane in florida was "Irma" and before that was "Wilma". Hope it helps bro :)
6 0
4 years ago
1. Which of the following were the effects of the Homestead Act on the American Indians in the late 1800s? Select the two correc
Anton [14]

1. A. increased encroachment of white settlers onto American Indian lands

  D. violence against American Indians

The Homestead Act was an act that had the purpose to motivate the people to move into the land on the west, develop it, thus expand the influence of the country and contribute to its political and economic interests. In order to motivate the people, the government was giving them enormous amounts of land for very small fees. What the people needed to do was to plant crops on the land and build permanent shelter, and remain on it for at least five years in order to get it officially. This also meant more injustice for the Indians. The Indian tribes were forced out of their lands, so they were forced to move into areas that didn't had good living conditions. Some tribes were not willing to leave their land, and that caused violence toward them, as the government wanted to get that land by any cost.

2.

1. Treaty of Medicine Lodge moves Indians to a region that is now Oklahoma.

<em>2.</em> First Treaty of Laramie orders that Indians move out of the path of white settlement (1868)

<em>3.</em> Indians are forced out of the Black Hills region when gold is discovered (1876)

<em>4.</em> The Dawes Act terminates tribal ownership of most reservation lands. (1887)

The interests of the American government very often were going against the interest and well being of the Native Americans. Numerous acts have been implemented, but also some treaties, as well as using force in order to get to what is wanted. This has usually been ending up very badly for the Native Americans. The Treaties of Medicine Lodge and Treaties of Laramie forced the Native Americans away from their lands, effectively stilling and invading it, while they have been pushed into other, not so good areas. The discovery of gold in the Black Hills region too caused problems, as lot of people rushed into it in hope to get rich, which made the natives unhappy, so conflicts emerged, resulting in a treaty which was again bad for the natives. The Dawes Act effectively stripped the natives of owning their tribal lands, and it all fell under the governing of the United States, meaning that they officially became foreigners in their own traditional land.

3. C. converting to Christianity

The Native Americans had it very had for a long time after the white settlers came on their lands. Being inferior in technology, military, and in numbers, the natives were forced to give up on lot of things, including their lands and their traditions. Over time, being heavily outnumbered and having no political power whatsoever, they started to assimilate, some forcefully, some willingly. One of the traits that lot of the natives adopted through he assimilation was the religion of the white settlers, the Christianity. Lot of Native Americans have become followers of the Christian faith, resulting in further destruction of their traditional culture and beliefs. Another trait of the assimilation is the English language, which has been adopted and has become the primary language of communication, but also the way of behavior, way of dressing etc.

4. D. The U.S. government came to condemn the incident because so many women and children were murdered

The Sand Creek Massacre was an organized attack on several Native American tribes by the military of the United States. Lot of people were killed, with the numbers ranging anywhere from 70 up to 500, including even women and children. This cruelty by the US government and military understandably angered the Native Americans that were attacked, and they were seeking for revenge. This resulted in unification between several tribes in order to get back to the white settlers, so relatively large army was assembled, and numerous attacks were performed over the white settlers. In these attacks, the Native Americans killed men, women, and children, and showed no mercy in order to get their revenge. This led to panic and lot of fear among the white settlers, as they saw that the natives are not helpless and that they can strike back ferociously. Eventually, the US government condemned the incident, despite it being involved in it at the first place. The reason for this was that they didn't thought that during the attack, apart from soldiers, lot of women and even children got murdered, so they tried to fix their mistake, though it was already too late.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Wine
    9·1 answer
  • 2. What kind of land is most suited for mechanized farming? a. hilly land b. steep mountains c. flat plains d. rocky coasts
    15·1 answer
  • Can you give me the characteristics of Stalin's dictature? Thanks, 17 points for this!<br> Quick!
    6·1 answer
  • Name some things brought to the Americas from Europe, Asia, and Africa—be sure to include grains, livestock, disease, &amp;
    5·1 answer
  • Adam tells Eve if he could, he would speed ahead of Eve to Heaven and take all the blame for them both. True False
    7·2 answers
  • Tomochichi was captured and enslaved by James Oglethorpe.<br> O True<br> False
    11·2 answers
  • Would you expect people to be quiet and respectful when they enter hallowed halls of a great institution or rowdy and noisy
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP IF U CAN!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Why is the First Amendment’s protection of personal freedoms to important?
    12·1 answer
  • Due to this policy, most Jewish and European refugees fleeing Europe were denied entry into the United States from 1933-1945
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!