1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Komok [63]
4 years ago
12

Why does Hamilton believe so strongly in the independence of the courts?

History
1 answer:
liberstina [14]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

please Mark as brainliest---

Explanation:

For me, this has been the summer of Alexander Hamilton—not because of Broadway’s hit musical, but because of Federalist 78, one of Hamilton’s greatest essays (and that’s grading on a steep curve), written in defense of the then-proposed Constitution’s framework for an independent judicial branch.

I had reason to return to the essay several times in recent months, in classes that I was fortunate to teach for the Hertog Foundation and the Hudson Institute, and in conversations that I’ve had recently with thoughtful Washington policymakers reflecting on the Supreme Court’s role in American government and society today. Written in 1788, Federalist 78 is famous (among lawyers, at least) for its description of the federal judiciary as “the least dangerous branch,” and for its defense of judicial independence and the constitutional power of “judicial review,” by which courts declare statutes unconstitutional. But teaching Hamilton’s essay and other Federalist Papers to students, and discussing it with friends and colleagues, I’m struck by how Hamilton’s most luminous lines overshadow some of the less well-remembered passages, as well as the broader context in which they were written. Today, more than ever, we should focus on these overshadowed aspects of Federalist 78. Americans are once again debating the Supreme Court’s role in American government and society, in light of Justice Antonin Scalia’s passing, the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace him, and years of controversial decisions from the Court on questions of free speech, religious liberty, same-sex marriage, executive power, regulatory overreach, and more. In these debates, we would do well to understand Federalist 78—and not just its famous lines.

The place to begin is a letter by “Brutus,” a pseudonymous critic of the then-proposed Constitution, in March 1788. (Historian Herbert Storing later included it as “Brutus No. 15” in his landmark collection of anti-Federalist papers.) Reacting to the Constitution’s proposal to give federal judges life tenure (that is, “during good behaviour”), removable by Congress only through impeachment, Brutus blasted the proposed federal judiciary in terms that seem familiar to modern debates:

The framers of this constitution appear to have followed that of the British, in rendering the judges independent, by granting them their offices during good behaviour,

You might be interested in
HELP ASAP! TIMED TEST!
raketka [301]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which best describes why trade was difficult during Washington’s first term as president? There was a trade embargo on US ports.
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

The answer that you are looking for is  C.) There were multiple currencies.

Explanation:

I did the test and got 100% on edge 2020

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first president is me because i was born during the tines
Sladkaya [172]
Martin Van Buren I think
8 0
3 years ago
A major result of the Industrial Revolution was the
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

A. Introduction of women and children into the labor force

Explanation:

The Industrial Revolution transformed economies that had been based on agriculture and handicrafts into economies based on large-scale industry, mechanized manufacturing, and the factory system. New machines, new power sources, and new ways of organizing work made existing industries more productive and efficient.

6 0
3 years ago
PLZ ANSWER IF YOU KNOW
Nataliya [291]

Answer:

here

Explanation:

what did the united states believe to be the southern boundary of the new state of texasFor centuries, America’s borders were up for grabs.

European nations staked claims on paper while tribes claimed the ground itself, but the border remained a work in progress, an imaginary line, until troops clashed and treaties settled the question.

In 1849, after the Mexican-American War, the United States sent teams of surveyors, soldiers and laborers to mark this new line in the desert, which sounded simple but proved difficult. The teams struggled as the Southwest seethed with conflict.

A line had been drawn, but the History has blurred the details, but the tale hangs on a boozy dispute, angry words, a scuffle and a gunshot. It was October 1849. Commissioner John B. Weller and surveyor Andrew Gray had been sent to the border of the United States and Mexico to mark a line that existed only on maps, and the work was not going well. Some say Weller struck Gray in the jaw; others say he tried to strangle Gray. In both accounts, Gray shot Weller in the thigh.

The border survey, less than a year old, was a mess.

The dispute was one of many problems that cropped up while the U.S. struggled to define its southern border after the Mexican-American War. It was not the first time the United States had experienced border problems. They began as soon as settlers started moving west.

In 1801, for example, the border was fluid, changing, a work in progress. There was no official border, just a big muddy river on the edge of Louisiana, “that part of North America lying between the Mississippi River and the Rocky Mountains,” Stephen E. Ambrose writes in “Undaunted Courage.” All of it was "up for grabs."

For three centuries, England, France and Spain had claimed various pieces of North America by sending soldiers, settlers, trappers and merchants to plant flags, move goods and buildFor three centuries, England, France and Spain had claimed various pieces of North America by sending soldiers, settlers, trappers and merchants to plant flags, move goods and build forts. They drew up maps, signed treaties and made plans, but their hold on these lands was weak. Americans had already streamed over the Appalachian Mountains and settled the Ohio Valley. A few had crossed the Mississippi, “most of them illegally,” Ambrose writes. What would happen next was not clear.

The U.S. was largely unsettled, one in five Americans was a slave, Western tribes still controlled their homeland and nothing traveled “faster than the speed of a horse.” It “seemed unlikely that one nation could govern an entire continent,” Ambrose writes.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Tragedy of the 19th amendment
    5·1 answer
  • Which term best describes government in Russia after the Communists took power?
    7·1 answer
  • List ways in which scholars look for clues ranking the methods from what you think would be the most useful to the least useful
    14·1 answer
  • How did the american system attempt to revamp the american economy after the war of 1812?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the major purpose behind the warsaw pact??
    9·1 answer
  • What was the economic system prevailing in europe in the 1500s and 1600s which favored a balance of exports over imports with a
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains the events shown on the timeline above?<br> (
    9·1 answer
  • Vorld History Period 03 Digital)
    11·1 answer
  • I’ll mark ya as brainliest! Answer the one question!
    13·1 answer
  • What is the name of the battle that kicked off the american revolution?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!