Answer:
A more gradual realization of victimization
Explanation:
Answer:
b. panic Disorder (without agoraphobia).
Explanation:
Panic disorder: The panic disorder is distinguished as unexpected and recurring panic attacks accompanying one month of either fret about consequences of the attacks or the future attacks as well as the specific changes in behavior because of the attack.
Agoraphobia in the absence of a history related to panic disorder is defined as an anxiety disorder in which the person dealing with the disorder doesn't meet the DSM-5 criteria for panic disorder. Agoraphobia is also referred to as the primary agoraphobia. However, in a few cases, agoraphobia can occur without the presence of panic attacks.
B is the answer because the Europeans were immune to the virus and the Indians weren't so they grew very ill which helped the Europeans.
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
