1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following was NOT a weakness of the Articles of Confederation? Group of answer choices d) National government could

not regulate trade between states c) National government taxed the people without representation a) National government could not tax b) National government had no way to enforce laws
History
1 answer:
Reika [66]3 years ago
3 0
National government was not a weakness beacsue Usjdkd jdheod jbrnd hjbrd jkshsk hjdkd jdkdl laud jdje a the ksbdnd ljsjd
You might be interested in
By calling people "aliens", how does this allow the government to ignore these people's inalienable rights?
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

While the document does acknowledge some of these rights, suggesting that these two ... rights record of the American government with respect to Native peoples, ... recognition of property rights will allow for special prosecution of people who ... Violating federal transparency law, the commission ignored career diplomats ...

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between the government of the Roman republic and that of imperial rome?
german
The government has more power then the Roman
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The most valid counter argument to the description of the mongols by the Russian duke was that the Mongols
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The most valid counter-argument to the description of the Mongols by the Russian duke was that the Mongols were interested only in plunder and treasure but not in controlling the Russian territory.

As we know by reading this part of history, the Mongols were terrible warriors that showed no mercy. They were fierce fighters that indeed were interested in destroying and plunder. And more than conquering and establish a form of government to rule a territory, by the way, they attacked and proceeded, it seemed that they were more interested in becoming wealthy.

5 0
2 years ago
Which statement best explains the effect of the international trade on american industries
Brums [2.3K]
Please add the answer options.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the egyptians devote so much time and effort to building tombs
Anvisha [2.4K]
They wanted there pharohs to pass on into a caste system like after life
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Children in new england were required to attend school so they could?
    15·2 answers
  • What were the three major subjects about which Jeremiah wrote in the book by his name?
    14·1 answer
  • How did England become the dominant Colonial power in North America
    10·2 answers
  • How and why did the federal government exchanged Westland migration
    7·1 answer
  • Not everyone in Texas and the South supported the Confederacy and the Civil War. Who in the South showed opposition to the Confe
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the most important point made in sir Alfred's letter <br> Please help
    15·1 answer
  • The Mongols and Tanguts had a trade dispute over <br> tariffs<br> silk<br> horses<br> grain
    11·1 answer
  • Who is Candace like i dont know they keep talking bout balls
    13·2 answers
  • What did defenders of enslavement state would happen if slavery was ended?
    6·1 answer
  • The Yankee (American) whaling ships began appearing in Spanish California at an increasing rate, driven by their desire for all
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!