All categories

2 years ago

Using complete sentences, explain negative consequences associated with limiting women's property rights.

2 answers:

7 0

The negative consequences could be that there would be more homeless people on the street (and not because we couldn't get jobs), There could also be rioting in the streets.

Hope that helps with a few Ideas.

ella [17]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The negative consequence of limiting women's rights is that it leaves them unprotected from any kind of violence, disrespect, exploitation and prejudice.

Explanation:

Women's rights is something that is sought for many years, many women over the centuries have struggled to have these rights guaranteed and much still needs to be done to make women seen as a human being equal to men.

Over the years, women have been exploited, raped, deprived of liberty and education and prevented from owning their own bodies and free will. Women's rights seek to minimize these problems and ensure that women are seen as equal. Limiting these rights means bringing all those problems back, which would be a horrible, cruel and unforgivable thing.

You might be interested in

Scatterbrain Samantha often forgets to lock her house. This has caused the probability of a burglary to be 30%. If her house get

Goryan [66]

Answer:

The question is missing the below options:

A $3000 ?B$10,000 ?C$30,000 ?D$100,000

The correct option is A,as expected loss is $3000 as computed below

Explanation:

The expected loss can be computed thus:

probability of theft*property loss of theft+probability of no theft*property loss of no theft

Probability of theft is 0.3(30%)

probability of no theft 0.7(1-0.3)

property loss of theft is $10000

property loss when no theft occur is $0

Expected loss=0.3*$10000+0.7*$0

expected loss=$3000+$0

expected loss=$3000

One needs to know that the entire probability of theft and no theft occurring is 1,so when one is given as 0.3,automatically the remainder belongs to other.

7 0

2 years ago

Type a paragraph on Barnabas.

user100 [1]

Barnabas, born Joseph or Joses, was according to tradition an early Christian, one of the prominent Christian disciples in Jerusalem. According to Acts 4:36, Barnabas was a Cypriot Jew. According to Acts 4:36, Barnabas was a Cypriot Jew. Named an apostle in Acts 14:14, he and Paul the Apostle undertook missionary journeys together and defended Gentile converts against the Judaizers. They traveled together making more converts ( c. 46–48), and participated in the Council of Jerusalem.

6 0

2 years ago

In 1644, the Manchus conquered the Ming dynasty and established the Qing dynasty. Which of the following statements is true

daser333 [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You arrive late to a biological seminar. however, just as you enter the room, you hear the speaker referring to the "amino end"

elixir [45]

I believe the answer is protein

7 0

3 years ago

If an offender is sentenced to life without the possibility of parole, then the offender will remain in jail for the rest of his

Naddik [55]

It is not fair in my opinion, because the 50 year old has already lived a life, where as the 20 year old hasn't. The 50 year old has already has done things in his or her life that the 20 year old won't be able to do. For example, when the 20 year old gets out of jail he will be 80 meaning he may never experience things such as getting married, having children, and etc. The 50 year old may have already done those things in his or her life, so it is very unfair to the 20 year old. The sentencing is also unfair due to the fact being both of them committed the crime and should have the same time served in jail.

Hint: that the last sentence might not hold up due to the fact of what he or she did and it pertains to how serve the crime was for both parties. Such as one person killed someone, while the other one didn't pull the trigger but was an accomplice or new about the killing. So it really depends on the crime or crimes the person has committed.

3 0

2 years ago