Answer: $480
Explanation:
The net cash inflow from operating activities on Packard's statement of cash flows for Year 2 will be calculated thus:
Revenue earned = $1000
Less : Expenses paid = ($520)
Operating cashflow = $480 inflow
The net cash inflow from operating activities on Packard's statement of cash flows for Year 2 will be $480.
Answer:
The correct answer is $132,664.89.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Present value (PV) = $50,000
Rate of interest (r) = 5%
Time period (n) = 20 Years
So, we can calculate future value by using following formula:
Future value = PV × (1 + r)^(n)
= $50000 × ( 1 + 5% )^20
= $50000 × (1 + 0.05)^20
= $132,664.89
Hence, After 20 years land will be worth $132,664.89.
Answer: Contact efficiency.
Explanation:
Phoenix automated retail provides contact efficiency for their customers as they help reduce the stages the consumers pass through before they can hire their products. Contact efficiency is a method of eliminating unnecessary stages in the supply chain between the consumer and the product they seek to purchase.
Answer:
$12,500 income tax; $1,250 penalty
Explanation:
The distribution from the traditional IRA is fully taxable since he Tyson receives a distribution of the entire $50,000 balance of his traditional IRA
($50,000 x 25%) = $12,500.
Therefore Tyson must pay a 10% penalty on the portion of the distribution that he did not contribute to a Roth IRA despite Tyson receives a distribution of the entire $50,000 balance of his traditional IRA in which he retains $12,500 to pay tax on the distribution
($12,500 x 10%) =$1,250
Therefore $12,500 will be his income tax amount and $1,250 will be his penalty amount
" There is an unequal distribution of power in the company " best explains this situation
Explanation:
Inequity is the almost inevitable result of two strong forces:
human bias and socioeconomic injustice.
One may debate whether or not power imbalances and other social inequalities induce bias.
(Even though the notion of a single variable approach to these debates encourages most of us, the truth is more complex; each one strengthens the other and this always results in a chicken and egg debate.)
Unfairness and discrimination can also be found interchangeably with everyday terminology.
I presumption a difference here: the definition of the word 'inequality' and the control of the expression 'inequity.' Inequality contributes to the allocation of such products, some of which earn more than others. Inequity stretches into this: not just unequal allocation; disproportionate and unjust allocation.