Answer: Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X
Explanation: Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Christian minister, scholar and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the Civil Rights Movement from 1955 until his assassination in 1968. His "I have a dream speech" is popular all around the world. He believed in a moderate non-violent approach for achieving equality.
Malcolm X was an American Muslim minister and human rights activist who was also very popular during the civil rights movement. He is best known for his staunch and controversial black racial advocacy and his belief that the movement's aim be achieved by any means necessary.
Luther King advocated non-violent direct action and passive resistance while Malcolm X urged his fellow black Americans to protect themselves against white aggression by any means necessary, even violence. This basic difference in their strategies often made them at odds with each other.
Supreme Court Justices
The nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are nominated by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
In the 1760's, "country whigs" were Englishmen who <span>considered the British government to be corrupt and oppressive. They primarily rejected the idea of an absolute monarchy. They played a significant role in the political landscape as they continued to be critical of the British government. </span>
Depends on when you are talking about. This sounds like a Biblical Question so I'll answer it that way.
Very surprisingly, during David's time the population wasn't much more than a couple of thousand according to archaeologists. The area covered was no more than 40 acres even during Solomon's time when Jerusalem was a very important city. It may have had a larger population than in David's time, but the size was not much different.
Forty acres was not much. To give you an idea just how big that might be, consider that a section of land is 1 square mile. 1 section = 640 acres.
40 acres is 1/16 of a square mile. That's like 5 city blocks in any direction and that might be overestimating in. Imagine that? I was very surprised to read that. The temple was massive when you read about it and so were the stables for the horses.
Anyway, if I find out any differently, I'll post in comments. These are secular accounts and not Biblical ones, but I don't hear anyone seriously disputing this.
