1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
9

How did Thomas Hobbes’s interpretation of the social contract differ from John Locke’s?

History
1 answer:
user100 [1]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

  • Hobbes' interpretation of the social contract believed human beings were inherently at odds with each other and therefore needed an authoritarian government to rule over them.
  • Lockes' interpretation of the social contract believed that human beings are morally neutral by nature, and can live side by side without a government -- but that creating a government makes society better.

Explanation:

Both English philosophers, Hobbes and Locke, believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and harmful toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching about Hobbes and Locke, I've often described the difference between them in this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

You might be interested in
PLZ QUICK ILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST I NEED HELP FAST!!!
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

x= 9

Explanation:

90-30 = 60

5x + 15 = 60

5x = 45

x = 9

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the report below, a Nazi officer describes the evacuation of the Warsaw ghetto in 1943. "The execution of this transfer order
Alex

D some Jews fought against the Nazis rather than be sent to concentration camps.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Homestead act greatly impacted the American Indians of the Great Plains by
ddd [48]
Creating a drain on the food,clothing and shelter of American Indians.

Hope it helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was an advantage held by the Patriots during the Revolutionary War?
Oduvanchick [21]
Your answer is 'B. Skilled military leader'.
7 0
3 years ago
How did the media shape public perception of the vietnam war?
Ugo [173]

Vietnam: war and the media

In the early years of the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War (1955-1975) everything was, according to historian John Lewis Gaddis, "hidden and denied". Correspondents in Washington had access to data that concealed the truth. The newspapers, without being able to reconcile the information provided by Washington with those coming from Saigon, preferred to publish the official version. The United States has not tried to impose censorship on Vietnam to solve its problems. Quite the contrary: a real “Public Relations” campaign was launched to publicize his version of the war. During the conflict, journalists from the most diverse backgrounds were invited to visit the country and write about what they had seen. So many perks were granted, that they saw themselves with a "moral" obligation of gratitude, ending up publishing exactly what the propaganda of the American government wanted.

There was, however, a famous exception to the farce of war coverage by the American government. On August 5, 1965, a report by Morley Safer for CBS showed US Marines burning Vietnamese village huts with lighters, triggering a (semi-official) campaign by the Pentagon to discredit the television report and qualify the correspondent as “impatriotic”.

Until then, most of the fighting in Vietnam was reported after it occurred or, at best, if the confrontation was too long and reporters got access, reporting precariously what was happening inside the battlefield, with huge delay and very little precision .

After the offensive by the Vietnamese revolutionary forces, American action was seen by a large part of society as "disorderly, frustrated and costly action". The press started to show the “live war”, unleashing a spirit of national dissatisfaction in practically all levels of society.

Television is a medium that greatly influenced the American civilian population during the Vietnam War in the 1960s. The display of fighting and the cruelty of the American military itself towards the Vietnamese radically changed the relationship that public opinion had with that conflict. Internal protests were responsible for the withdrawal of the military from the Vietnam war.

At the end of the 1960s, the failure of American action was already evident, which was controversial in successive pacification campaigns in the USA and in different parts of the world. With more than one million dead and two million wounded, the “cease fire” did not take place until January 23, 1973 and the withdrawal of American troops was completed two years later, on March 25, 1975.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was confirmed by the publication of the venona papers
    10·1 answer
  • he breakdown of chiefdoms eventually led to the development of A) Native American societies. B) explorations by Europeans. C) th
    11·2 answers
  • Why did foreign powers treat U.S. government under the Articles of Confederation with scorn
    13·1 answer
  • Why wood suitable to build boats and rafts
    7·1 answer
  • A victim has sustained a blunt force trauma to the chest. A pulmonary contusion is suspected. Which of the following clinical ma
    7·1 answer
  • Which was not a cause of the European Enlightenment? (5 points) A) the Protestant Reformation B) the Scientific Revolution C) se
    8·1 answer
  • At first, why didn’t the Senate allow the law of emancipation (of slaves) a thing?
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME, I’ll give brainlest
    7·1 answer
  • What is correct about John Monroe
    8·2 answers
  • Explain how the Enlightenment challenged the idea of Absolute Kings and Queens ruling the<br> land.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!