There is a radical error, I think, in the usual mode of constructing a story.
Answer: 1.The first part was unnecessary and the second part had words that were redundant
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues.
Explanation:
1. The first part was unnecessary, since it was transitional phrases. The second part had words that were redundant. For example, you don't need the re in front of duplicate and with the word again. Or office in government with voting,
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues. The motto less is more pertains to this sentence.
A third person narrator knows all the characters' feelings and thoughts, an author might choose this perspective to let the reader know everything the characters are feeling and what's going on. This gives a broader perspective on the story and can influence the readers opnion.
