Foster states that "The fact is that we can only love what we know personally" and adds that Tolerance "merely means putting up with people, being able to stand things." It has always been human condition to succumb to feelings of love for an activity, family, a significant other and reject what requires tolerance to the new or the unknown. Foster stands up for tolerance as the means of reconstructing and which might unite races and peoples from the world. Love is enjoying people, things, places, a pleasant state. Tolerance, on the contrary, is to try to love what you do not like. There are many an example or situation in our daily life. Foster says that tolerance is wanted in the queue, at the telephone, perhaps when the boy nobody likes in class participates and expresses his opinion. The attempt to tolerate people can make a meaningful difference.
D I think tell me if I am wrong
It's not about how to tell him.
It's just that you have to tell him.
I would recommend being direct. Men tend to communicate directly more. Don't hint. Don't say “we should just be friends” don't say how good of a time you had. Because being indirect like that, while is nice and it does soften the blow a bit, it also creates an opportunity for him to look for hidden meaning, trying to find how there might be a chance.
Better to just be direct, “I have to tell you this, I don't want to lead you on. I don't have romantic feelings for you. I feel it's better to tell you this out of respect to you and your time. I'm sorry”
You cant control how someone responds to this situation, but the right thing to do is to let him know asap. And you have to find comfort knowing you did the right thing.
He will either take it well or he won't, the HOW it was said will have little to do with how he takes it. And how he responds is part of his set of challenges.
Don't feel guilty for leading him on before. You cant change that (if that's actually what happened) what you can change is not continuing to do so.
Your answer to this will be the last sentence.
However, he deserves little credit, for since that time, still greater strides have been made in battlefield medicine.
I am 100% sure of this
Answer:
B). No more kerosene lamps that burned our eyes and sent us gasping for breath.
Explanation:
In the given excerpt, the line 'No more...breath' reflects the background regarding Malawai and the way windmill would consider the interest of its people. It shows that the windmill would provide electricity to the people and thus, kerosene lamps are not required anymore and prevent the struggles people of Malawai had to do for it. Earlier the people were compelled to go to bed in the early evening but the windmill allowed people to read at night and do other activities as well. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
