1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WITCHER [35]
3 years ago
11

In recent years, people have been motivated to move from rural areas to urban areas for __________.

History
2 answers:
fomenos3 years ago
6 0
They move for jobs and better lifestyle.
ankoles [38]3 years ago
4 0
They moved because there were more jobs.
You might be interested in
Proponents of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) argued that it would help the U.S. economy by __________.
Greeley [361]
Proponents of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) argued that it would help the U.S. economy by "<span>b. opening up new markets for the export of American goods" since it formed alliances. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
why does the president make a point of saying “cannot ask that every american remain neutral in thought”?
natta225 [31]

Answer:

Bc they just do.

Explanation:

So they won't get hate for being 1 sided.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the effects after Diocletian split the Roman Empire?
stealth61 [152]

Answer:

The Roman Empire was once a superpower. Back in the days of the early 2nd century, Emperor Trajan stretched the kingdom's territory to its maximum. After that, how to secure the frontier had become an issue that all the future emperors had to address. Because most of those emperors were not nearly as capable as Trajan, the Roman Empire was soon in trouble. By the 3rd century, the situation had grown so bad that this once formidable powerhouse was at the brink of self-destruction. During the period from 235 A.D. to 284 A.D. (often called the crisis of the third century, the military anarchy, or the imperial crisis), more than two-dozen emperors came and went. Out-of-control inflation brought the economy to its knees. And foreign tribes continued to harass the borders. Just as things could not get worse for the Roman Empire, relief finally arrived. In November of 284 A.D., Diocletian, a forceful Roman general, seized power and declared himself the new emperor. One of his earliest orders was to split the Roman Empire in two. He kept the eastern part and gave the western half to his colleague, Maximian.  Diocletian's decision was bold but practical. He figured that the Roman Empire had simply grown too big over the years to be managed effectively by a single person. In 285 A.D., he named his trusted military friend, Maximian, as a Caesar or a junior emperor, while he himself was named an Augustus or a senior emperor. The following year, Diocletian promoted Maximian to be his equal, so both men held the title of Augustus and ruled the split Roman Empire side-by-side. Diocletian chose the city of Nicomedia (modern day's Izmit, Turkey) to be the capital of his Eastern Roman Empire, whereas Maximian picked Milan to be the capital of his Western Roman Empire. With the kingdom broken into two, Diocletian and Maximian were each responsible for fighting the enemies in their respective territory. As it was no longer necessary to stretch the troops across the entire empire, it was much easier to put down the rebels. Diocletian's daring experiment paid off handsomely. By 293 A.D., Diocletian decided to go a step further and resolve the issue of succession once and for all. That year, both of the senior emperors handpicked their own Caesar. Diocletian chose Galerius, and Maximian selected Constantius. Galerius and Constantius were like apprentices. They did not sit idly waiting for the two senior emperors to die or to retire. Instead, they were each given a sizable territory and had their own capital. Galerius resided at Sirmium (in today's Serbia), and Constantius camped at Trier (in today's Germany). Diocletian called this new power structure tetrarchy or "rule by four."

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How do single stories positively or negatively relate to U.S. History?
Shalnov [3]
Single stories negatively relate to U.S. history because it caused a lot of hate to be given toward a specific person or group of people just because someone made up a fake story. Single stories have always been a problem not just now but all throughout history.
5 0
3 years ago
Guys i have a 15% in history im not even playing rn help ORRR ima get a whoopin ahhh arab moms hit hard
san4es73 [151]
I’m pretty sure it’s C
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between john calvin and catholic church?
    8·1 answer
  • Notice that neutral Belgium is located between Germany and France. How do you think Belgium and the rest of the world regarded G
    14·1 answer
  • Which number on the map indicates the Bering Strait and ancient land bridge?
    14·1 answer
  • What role does the Supreme Court play in the federal judicial system
    14·1 answer
  • Why is Dec. 7, 1941 called "a day that will live in infamy"?
    8·1 answer
  • The use of money helped _______ to develop. help will give the brain thing
    11·2 answers
  • Which of these countries does not use the dollar? The literal meaning of this country is ‘Land of the pure’. It is also home to
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Vietnam War impact Chicanos?
    6·1 answer
  • The House of Representatives and the Senate make up which branch of the U.S. Government?
    5·1 answer
  • Besides combat, how were african americans involved in the war effort
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!